H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Gilles Muller H2H: 3-1

Fernando Verdasco holds a 3–1 lead over Gilles Muller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2016 Miami Masters first round 7-6(2) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 25, 2016* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Fernando Verdasco #65 7-6(2) 6-3 Gilles Muller #44 Match data
Sep 25, 2015* Metz ATP 250 R16 Hard Gilles Muller #45 7-6(3) 7-6(2) Fernando Verdasco #43 Match data
May 31, 2012* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Fernando Verdasco #16 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 6-2 Gilles Muller #54 Match data
Jan 19, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Fernando Verdasco #36 6-3 6-0 6-4 Gilles Muller #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,071 200 199 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,599 0 0
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,727 0 0
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,535 0 0
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,578 0 0
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,675 0 0
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,634 0 0
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,612 0 0
28 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5 2012 20–20 50.0% #67 1,834 0 0
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6 2013 2–7 22.2% #368 1,691 0 0
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,743 0 0
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 2016 33–23 58.9% #34 1,956 0 0
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,939 0 2
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,687 0 2
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —