H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 4-2

Fernando Verdasco holds a 4–2 lead over Guillermo Canas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 3–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2008 Vienna fourth round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Guillermo Canas
ARG Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 10, 2008* Vienna ATP 500 R16 Hard Fernando Verdasco #13 6-1 6-2 Guillermo Canas #61 Match data
Jun 9, 2005* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Guillermo Canas #8 6-4 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #57 Match data
Jan 21, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Guillermo Canas #12 3-6 7-5 6-3 6-0 Fernando Verdasco #36 Match data
May 12, 2004* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fernando Verdasco #52 7-6(3) 7-6(7) Guillermo Canas #70 Match data
Mar 6, 2004* Acapulco ATP 250 SF Clay Fernando Verdasco #103 6-3 3-6 6-3 Guillermo Canas #135 Match data
Feb 26, 2004* Costa Do Sauipe ATP 250 R32 Clay Fernando Verdasco #108 6-1 1-0 (ret.) Guillermo Canas #141 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Guillermo Canas #1,110 #8 2,075 2,008 244 188 56.5% 0 1 0 0 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Guillermo Canas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0 1996 0–3 0.0% #183 1,462 0 0
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0 1997 1–4 20.0% #129 1,461 0 0
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1 1998 6–14 30.0% #95 1,481 0 0
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1 1999 15–23 39.5% #71 1,575 0 0
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 2000 5–12 29.4% #231 1,530 0 0
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 2001 45–21 68.2% #15 1,840 0 1
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2 2002 41–22 65.1% #15 1,857 0 3
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3 2003 5–4 55.6% #272 1,805 0 3
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5 2004 40–21 65.6% #12 1,898 0 6
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5 2005 22–11 66.7% #102 1,889 0 6
28 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5 2007 38–21 64.4% #15 1,821 0 7
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6 2008 21–19 52.5% #79 1,690 0 7
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 2009 5–13 27.8% #191 1,628 0 7
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7 — — — — — — —
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —