H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 2-1

Fernando Verdasco holds a 2–1 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–0 on grass, while Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2008 Queen's Club Championships first round 5-3 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Hyung-Taik Lee
KOR Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Verdasco #20 5-3 (ret.) Hyung-Taik Lee #55 Match data Jun 11, 2008* R64 Queen's Club Championships International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Fernando Verdasco #30 6-2 5-7 6-4 Hyung-Taik Lee #109 Match data Jun 15, 2006* R32 Queen's Club Championships ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Hyung-Taik Lee #59 6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #105 Match data Oct 2, 2003* R32 Japan Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,127 549 442 55.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Hyung-Taik Lee #1,256 #36 864 1,798 121 156 43.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Hyung-Taik Lee
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,591 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #241 1,509 0 0
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,730 0 1 1996 0–1 0.0% #283 1,497 0 0
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,790 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 1999 1–2 33.3% #191 1,497 0 0
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,875 0 2 2000 7–5 58.3% #90 1,642 0 0
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,003 0 3 2001 9–19 32.1% #116 1,559 0 0
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,927 0 5 2002 11–14 44.0% #87 1,625 0 0
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,931 0 5 2003 18–23 43.9% #56 1,606 0 1
28 2012 32–22 59.3% #24 1,901 0 5 2004 16–16 50.0% #59 1,693 0 1
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,896 0 5 2005 10–19 34.5% #107 1,625 0 1
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,879 0 6 2006 18–15 54.5% #49 1,736 0 1
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 2007 21–23 47.7% #51 1,769 0 1
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,823 0 7 2008 9–17 34.6% #107 1,611 0 1
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 2009 0–1 0.0% #871 1,580 0 1
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,914 0 7 — — — — — — —
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Verdasco Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 20 11 31 64.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 14 12 26 53.8% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 17 9 26 65.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 18 14 32 56.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2008 20 16 36 55.6% 17 8 25 68.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2000 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 35 15 50 70.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2001 3 14 17 17.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2010 21 13 34 61.8% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2011 19 14 33 57.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2012 11 10 21 52.4% 19 10 29 65.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
29 2013 9 13 22 40.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2005 5 11 16 31.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2014 11 11 22 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 2016 13 15 28 46.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 6 10 16 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 2017 18 15 33 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 18 14 32 56.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 13 14 27 48.1% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2023 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 259 235 494 52.4% 231 156 387 59.7% 51 44 95 53.7% 8 7 15 53.3% — 84 107 191 44.0% 20 27 47 42.6% 17 19 36 47.2% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/991 of Fernando Verdasco's and 199/206 of Hyung-Taik Lee's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Verdasco Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 3/3 1.7 6.3 71.8% 56.3% 32.1% 54.4% 39.3% 49.7% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 18/19 5.0 4.3 64.8% 68.3% 55.7% 51.0% 42.6% 63.8% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 56/56 4.8 3.2 66.0% 71.0% 56.3% 65.5% 40.6% 65.7% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 61/61 6.6 3.7 65.1% 72.5% 51.7% 60.0% 44.5% 65.2% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 56/56 3.9 3.8 72.5% 68.7% 49.7% 62.8% 43.6% 63.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 59/59 4.6 3.4 72.4% 70.2% 52.2% 55.3% 38.6% 65.1% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 72/72 3.8 4.1 72.6% 69.3% 53.0% 55.6% 47.6% 64.7% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 75/75 6.1 3.7 69.1% 73.1% 54.3% 62.2% 46.5% 67.1% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 64/64 5.4 4.8 67.1% 71.2% 49.4% 60.0% 44.6% 64.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 58/58 5.5 3.9 68.8% 70.7% 51.3% 61.5% 44.9% 64.6% 38.1% 2003 40/41 3.5 2.0 63.5% 68.1% 51.1% 53.0% 35.7% 62.0% 38.2%
28 2012 53/54 4.6 3.8 69.7% 69.7% 51.4% 64.4% 42.1% 64.1% 38.3% 2004 29/32 3.4 2.3 64.4% 69.4% 52.1% 53.8% 44.6% 63.6% 36.2%
29 2013 50/51 5.9 5.0 61.7% 72.8% 54.0% 56.4% 36.3% 65.3% 37.4% 2005 28/29 3.4 2.3 61.0% 68.0% 51.0% 54.1% 37.2% 61.8% 34.9%
30 2014 46/46 5.7 4.7 66.3% 71.7% 51.8% 65.6% 43.2% 64.5% 37.3% 2006 32/33 3.7 1.6 66.9% 68.9% 52.8% 60.1% 48.4% 63.9% 37.4%
31 2015 50/50 7.7 4.1 64.6% 73.5% 52.3% 60.8% 35.2% 66.1% 35.3% 2007 44/44 3.0 1.6 63.0% 70.3% 52.7% 53.0% 31.2% 64.0% 37.1%
32 2016 55/55 6.3 3.9 64.0% 73.2% 51.4% 62.1% 38.4% 65.1% 37.8% 2008 25/26 2.8 2.5 63.8% 65.5% 48.3% 52.8% 39.7% 59.3% 36.6%
33 2017 54/54 4.0 3.4 69.0% 70.6% 51.0% 53.7% 45.7% 64.6% 39.5% 2009 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.6% 60.0% 50.0% 63.6% 33.3% 55.6% 37.8%
34 2018 61/61 6.7 4.2 63.1% 72.0% 48.7% 59.3% 42.9% 63.4% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 53/53 7.7 3.7 63.8% 71.8% 49.4% 62.4% 40.0% 63.7% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 13/13 6.3 2.6 67.5% 68.9% 49.5% 59.7% 29.5% 62.7% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 10/10 3.9 3.2 66.9% 60.7% 48.4% 54.2% 28.3% 56.6% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 16/16 4.3 2.9 63.4% 66.0% 48.6% 58.4% 37.6% 59.8% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2023 5/5 1.0 4.0 62.6% 53.7% 32.4% 36.3% 45.3% 45.6% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/991 5.5 3.9 67.3% 70.9% 51.6% 59.9% 42.1% 64.4% 38.3% — 199/277 3.3 2.0 63.7% 68.6% 51.5% 54.4% 38.7% 62.6% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Verdasco Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2002 1502 102.0 -2.56 -2.05 0.736 44.2% — +27 — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1592 125.8 +1.64 -0.91 0.950 48.7% +9 -89 — 39.6% -0.77 2–4 (33%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 -0.48 1995 1510 105.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.15
20 2004 1731 140.6 +2.76 +0.54 1.085 51.4% -84 +24 -92 53.2% +0.29 6–8 (43%) 11–12 (48%) 100.4 -1.34 1996 1497 100.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.10
21 2005 1791 146.9 +2.51 +2.36 1.116 51.9% -27 +11 -149 55.1% +0.46 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) 100.7 -2.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1727 137.0 +0.96 +1.48 1.042 50.6% -72 +110 +30 56.5% +0.19 10–10 (50%) 14–10 (58%) 101.8 +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1864 150.9 +2.40 +2.23 1.097 51.3% -58 -13 -91 54.4% +0.38 11–10 (52%) 10–14 (42%) 101.0 -1.77 1999 1498 110.3 — — — — — — — 37.5% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.19
24 2008 1876 151.0 +1.44 +3.82 1.154 52.4% -51 +93 +36 58.0% +0.69 13–9 (59%) 13–14 (48%) 101.8 +1.79 2000 1643 126.3 — — — — +16 — — 55.2% +0.38 0–1 4–2 (67%) — +0.44
25 2009 2004 172.3 +4.14 +5.15 1.247 53.9% +20 +44 -100 66.0% +1.22 11–12 (48%) 15–19 (44%) 96.0 -0.23 2001 1560 126.2 — — — — -10 +45 — 37.1% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 100.8 -0.31
26 2010 1928 161.5 +1.35 +3.83 1.119 52.0% +11 +172 — 59.1% +0.69 18–5 (78%) 17–17 (50%) 104.3 +1.41 2002 1626 130.4 — — — — -62 -53 +45 47.8% -0.10 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 -0.15
27 2011 1931 156.9 +1.76 +2.02 1.077 51.0% -19 +115 -49 55.4% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 9–10 (47%) 97.4 -0.03 2003 1607 137.1 +0.37 +1.31 1.005 49.8% +38 -41 -12 43.6% -0.18 6–7 (46%) 5–12 (29%) 95.9 -1.24
28 2012 1902 158.3 +1.78 +1.64 1.068 50.9% -15 +110 -16 57.3% +0.45 7–6 (54%) 10–11 (48%) 96.5 +0.32 2004 1694 132.8 0.00 +0.22 0.996 50.1% -22 -76 +2 51.3% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 7–6 (54%) 99.5 -0.09
29 2013 1897 150.8 +1.90 +1.27 1.077 50.9% -69 +47 +113 54.3% +0.20 11–12 (48%) 14–10 (58%) 102.3 -0.19 2005 1626 129.9 -0.24 -0.93 0.913 48.4% -33 +14 +61 39.7% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 3–7 (30%) 94.6 -1.85
30 2014 1880 147.7 +0.99 +0.74 1.048 50.8% -58 +69 +74 55.4% +0.36 11–12 (48%) 12–16 (43%) 94.8 +1.67 2006 1737 133.5 +1.59 +0.54 1.037 50.7% -41 — -11 52.3% +0.01 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 110.0 -0.52
31 2015 1822 158.0 +2.13 -0.07 1.043 50.6% -12 +53 +115 47.4% +0.18 12–11 (52%) 13–16 (45%) 97.0 -2.42 2007 1770 137.1 +0.81 +0.33 1.029 50.3% +8 -188 -69 47.7% -0.11 5–7 (42%) 9–14 (39%) 97.7 +0.89
32 2016 1823 157.6 +1.70 +1.52 1.083 51.2% -31 +108 +59 53.3% +0.30 6–12 (33%) 15–12 (56%) 97.7 -1.95 2008 1611 130.0 -2.82 -0.10 0.900 48.3% +78 -31 — 43.8% -0.59 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 98.7 +0.14
33 2017 1896 164.3 +0.98 +3.38 1.115 51.7% -12 +46 -99 55.4% +0.30 6–15 (29%) 18–9 (67%) 98.6 -2.48 2009 1580 100.2 -0.70 -4.74 0.851 47.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.05
34 2018 1915 159.9 -0.10 +2.46 1.065 50.9% +25 +13 -172 51.9% +0.27 15–11 (58%) 8–17 (32%) 94.6 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1810 151.6 -0.18 +0.45 0.990 50.1% +22 +37 +5 51.4% +0.28 13–13 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 96.5 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1768 132.5 -0.34 -1.01 0.975 49.0% +72 — — 48.5% -0.27 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1627 114.6 -2.83 -1.10 0.807 46.0% — +81 — 25.0% -1.25 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1604 122.9 -3.29 -0.30 0.900 48.1% +74 +90 — 36.6% -0.81 2–4 (33%) 5–5 (50%) 98.8 +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2023 1536 96.8 -6.12 -1.90 0.625 40.2% +105 — — 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2128 158.8 +1.50 +2.00 1.077 51.2% -17 +67 -9 54.3% +0.35 175–178 (50%) 214–226 (49%) 97.0 -0.90 — 1799 138.7 +0.12 +0.29 0.985 49.7% -2 -43 +2 45.8% -0.27 37–52 (42%) 54–58 (48%) 99.2 -0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.