H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Igor Andreev H2H: 4-2

Fernando Verdasco holds a 4–2 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2012 Buenos Aires fourth round 7-6(3) 6-3.

ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 2
6 main draw meetings
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 24, 2012* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R16 Clay Igor Andreev #118 7-6(3) 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #25 Match data
Aug 28, 2009* New Haven ATP 250 SF Hard Fernando Verdasco #10 7-6(4) 7-6(5) Igor Andreev #30 Match data
Aug 31, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Igor Andreev #23 6-2 6-4 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #13 Match data
Jul 20, 2008* Umag ATP 250 F Clay Fernando Verdasco #15 3-6 6-4 7-6(4) Igor Andreev #30 Match data
Jul 21, 2005* Stuttgart ATP 250 R32 Clay Fernando Verdasco #58 6-4 5-7 7-6(5) Igor Andreev #48 Match data
Sep 1, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Fernando Verdasco #36 6-3 6-4 4-6 2-6 7-5 Igor Andreev #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Igor Andreev #1,011 #18 2,490 1,913 219 214 50.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Igor Andreev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0 2003 4–4 50.0% #88 1,565 0 0
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1 2004 25–26 49.0% #50 1,660 0 0
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1 2005 37–29 56.1% #26 1,832 0 3
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 2006 13–13 50.0% #91 1,760 0 3
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 2007 31–26 54.4% #33 1,769 0 3
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2 2008 38–27 58.5% #19 1,882 0 3
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3 2009 27–30 47.4% #35 1,693 0 3
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5 2010 17–19 47.2% #79 1,700 0 3
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5 2011 15–24 38.5% #115 1,688 0 3
28 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5 2012 12–15 44.4% #110 1,684 0 3
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5 2013 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,587 0 3
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7