H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Leonardo Mayer H2H: 4-1

Fernando Verdasco holds a 4–1 lead over Leonardo Mayer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leonardo Mayer won the 2018 Madrid Masters third round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Leonardo Mayer
ARG Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 9, 2018* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Leonardo Mayer #45 6-2 6-1 Fernando Verdasco #37 Match data
Feb 22, 2018* Rio de Janeiro ATP 500 R32 Clay Fernando Verdasco #40 6-2 3-6 6-3 Leonardo Mayer #49 Match data
Oct 23, 2014* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Hard Fernando Verdasco #35 6-4 3-6 6-3 Leonardo Mayer #25 Match data
May 21, 2010* Nice ATP 250 SF Clay Fernando Verdasco #9 7-6(3) 7-5 Leonardo Mayer #59 Match data
Aug 13, 2009* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Fernando Verdasco #11 6-1 6-1 Leonardo Mayer #62 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Leonardo Mayer #748 #21 1,605 1,937 166 194 46.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Leonardo Mayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1 2008 1–1 50.0% #115 1,476 0 0
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 2009 18–18 50.0% #75 1,674 0 0
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 2010 12–19 38.7% #94 1,652 0 0
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2 2011 4–7 36.4% #78 1,677 0 0
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3 2012 11–14 44.0% #71 1,725 0 0
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5 2013 12–18 40.0% #94 1,715 0 0
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5 2014 26–20 56.5% #28 1,830 0 1
28 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5 2015 24–23 51.1% #35 1,837 0 1
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5 2016 9–15 37.5% #139 1,727 0 1
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6 2017 11–8 57.9% #52 1,796 0 2
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 2018 22–25 46.8% #56 1,746 0 2
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7 2019 16–18 47.1% #92 1,710 0 2
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 2020 0–7 0.0% #135 1,605 0 2
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7 2021 0–1 0.0% #309 1,520 0 2
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —