H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Michael Llodra H2H: 4-1

Fernando Verdasco holds a 4–1 lead over Michael Llodra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2014 Roland Garros first round 6-2 7-6(4) 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Michael Llodra
FRA Age 46 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Verdasco #25 6-2 7-6(4) 7-6(3) Michael Llodra #153 Match data May 28, 2014* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Fernando Verdasco #23 6-2 6-4 Michael Llodra #33 Match data Oct 6, 2011* R32 China Open ATP 500 Hard
Fernando Verdasco #21 6-4 6-4 Michael Llodra #32 Match data Aug 17, 2011* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Fernando Verdasco #28 6-2 6-0 Michael Llodra #40 Match data May 14, 2008* R32 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Michael Llodra #109 6-4 7-6(4) Fernando Verdasco #31 Match data Nov 1, 2006* R64 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,127 549 442 55.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Michael Llodra #631 #21 1,575 1,902 183 216 45.9% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Michael Llodra
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,730 0 1 2000 5–7 41.7% #159 1,597 0 0
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,790 0 1 2001 6–11 35.3% #89 1,601 0 0
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 2002 12–17 41.4% #104 1,619 0 0
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 2003 2–10 16.7% #173 1,590 0 0
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,875 0 2 2004 20–12 62.5% #41 1,732 0 1
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,003 0 3 2005 10–20 33.3% #136 1,625 0 1
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,927 0 5 2006 4–8 33.3% #96 1,608 0 1
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,931 0 5 2007 13–18 41.9% #93 1,641 0 1
28 2012 32–22 59.3% #24 1,901 0 5 2008 22–20 52.4% #40 1,731 0 3
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,896 0 5 2009 17–16 51.5% #67 1,741 0 3
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,879 0 6 2010 27–21 56.2% #23 1,881 0 5
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 2011 17–21 44.7% #47 1,776 0 5
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,823 0 7 2012 12–14 46.2% #53 1,844 0 5
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 2013 12–15 44.4% #105 1,808 0 5
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,914 0 7 2014 4–6 40.0% #269 1,698 0 5
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Verdasco Michael Llodra
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 20 11 31 64.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2005 14 12 26 53.8% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2001 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 17 9 26 65.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
23 2007 18 14 32 56.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2003 0 7 7 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2008 20 16 36 55.6% 17 8 25 68.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2004 9 7 16 56.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2009 35 15 50 70.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2005 5 9 14 35.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2010 21 13 34 61.8% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2011 19 14 33 57.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2007 7 11 18 38.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2012 11 10 21 52.4% 19 10 29 65.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2013 9 13 22 40.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2009 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
30 2014 11 11 22 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
31 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 9 15 24 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
32 2016 13 15 28 46.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2012 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 2017 18 15 33 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
34 2018 18 14 32 56.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
35 2019 13 14 27 48.1% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2023 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 259 235 494 52.4% 231 156 387 59.7% 51 44 95 53.7% 8 7 15 53.3% — 109 133 242 45.0% 20 37 57 35.1% 44 30 74 59.5% 10 16 26 38.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/991 of Fernando Verdasco's and 381/399 of Michael Llodra's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Verdasco Michael Llodra
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 3/3 1.7 6.3 71.8% 56.3% 32.1% 54.4% 39.3% 49.7% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 18/19 5.0 4.3 64.8% 68.3% 55.7% 51.0% 42.6% 63.8% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 56/56 4.8 3.2 66.0% 71.0% 56.3% 65.5% 40.6% 65.7% 37.3% 2000 11/12 7.0 5.4 55.8% 74.2% 49.8% 51.0% 43.0% 63.8% 37.2%
21 2005 61/61 6.6 3.7 65.1% 72.5% 51.7% 60.0% 44.5% 65.2% 38.9% 2001 12/17 6.9 6.0 58.9% 69.2% 48.7% 51.2% 42.0% 60.8% 35.4%
22 2006 56/56 3.9 3.8 72.5% 68.7% 49.7% 62.8% 43.6% 63.3% 38.3% 2002 21/29 7.1 4.8 60.1% 75.3% 45.0% 49.2% 42.4% 63.4% 37.0%
23 2007 59/59 4.6 3.4 72.4% 70.2% 52.2% 55.3% 38.6% 65.1% 38.2% 2003 12/12 8.6 5.0 60.6% 68.2% 46.2% 60.6% 28.3% 59.2% 32.1%
24 2008 72/72 3.8 4.1 72.6% 69.3% 53.0% 55.6% 47.6% 64.7% 40.8% 2004 32/32 6.2 2.3 65.1% 75.9% 54.2% 69.7% 41.2% 68.4% 38.7%
25 2009 75/75 6.1 3.7 69.1% 73.1% 54.3% 62.2% 46.5% 67.1% 41.1% 2005 30/30 5.8 2.4 64.8% 70.1% 50.5% 58.0% 42.5% 63.1% 31.6%
26 2010 64/64 5.4 4.8 67.1% 71.2% 49.4% 60.0% 44.6% 64.0% 40.3% 2006 12/12 7.8 1.9 62.3% 70.8% 47.5% 44.9% 33.4% 62.4% 36.9%
27 2011 58/58 5.5 3.9 68.8% 70.7% 51.3% 61.5% 44.9% 64.6% 38.1% 2007 31/31 7.4 3.4 62.9% 72.6% 53.4% 65.0% 37.6% 65.4% 35.3%
28 2012 53/54 4.6 3.8 69.7% 69.7% 51.4% 64.4% 42.1% 64.1% 38.3% 2008 40/42 9.3 3.4 60.4% 73.5% 54.2% 66.1% 37.6% 65.9% 33.1%
29 2013 50/51 5.9 5.0 61.7% 72.8% 54.0% 56.4% 36.3% 65.3% 37.4% 2009 33/33 9.1 2.6 63.3% 77.3% 53.3% 63.8% 41.8% 68.4% 34.3%
30 2014 46/46 5.7 4.7 66.3% 71.7% 51.8% 65.6% 43.2% 64.5% 37.3% 2010 48/48 9.1 3.1 62.4% 76.1% 51.5% 63.3% 50.3% 66.9% 34.2%
31 2015 50/50 7.7 4.1 64.6% 73.5% 52.3% 60.8% 35.2% 66.1% 35.3% 2011 38/38 7.2 3.3 62.4% 73.7% 51.0% 64.3% 30.8% 65.2% 32.7%
32 2016 55/55 6.3 3.9 64.0% 73.2% 51.4% 62.1% 38.4% 65.1% 37.8% 2012 26/26 8.4 2.4 63.5% 73.4% 52.5% 59.8% 32.6% 65.6% 32.6%
33 2017 54/54 4.0 3.4 69.0% 70.6% 51.0% 53.7% 45.7% 64.6% 39.5% 2013 25/27 7.6 3.3 61.3% 75.3% 53.0% 53.8% 43.7% 66.3% 35.8%
34 2018 61/61 6.7 4.2 63.1% 72.0% 48.7% 59.3% 42.9% 63.4% 39.0% 2014 10/10 6.4 1.8 68.9% 70.3% 49.8% 53.7% 30.0% 64.0% 33.2%
35 2019 53/53 7.7 3.7 63.8% 71.8% 49.4% 62.4% 40.0% 63.7% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 13/13 6.3 2.6 67.5% 68.9% 49.5% 59.7% 29.5% 62.7% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 10/10 3.9 3.2 66.9% 60.7% 48.4% 54.2% 28.3% 56.6% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 16/16 4.3 2.9 63.4% 66.0% 48.6% 58.4% 37.6% 59.8% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2023 5/5 1.0 4.0 62.6% 53.7% 32.4% 36.3% 45.3% 45.6% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/991 5.5 3.9 67.3% 70.9% 51.6% 59.9% 42.1% 64.4% 38.3% — 381/399 7.8 3.2 62.4% 73.8% 51.5% 60.7% 39.6% 65.4% 34.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Verdasco Michael Llodra
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2002 1502 102.0 -2.56 -2.05 0.736 44.2% — +27 — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1592 125.8 +1.64 -0.91 0.950 48.7% +9 -89 — 39.6% -0.77 2–4 (33%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1731 140.6 +2.76 +0.54 1.085 51.4% -84 +24 -92 53.2% +0.29 6–8 (43%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.34 2000 1598 127.1 +0.78 +0.37 1.028 50.1% -44 — +71 38.7% -0.39 2–1 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.08
21 2005 1791 146.9 +2.51 +2.36 1.116 51.9% -27 +11 -149 55.1% +0.46 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) — -2.07 2001 1601 121.3 -0.66 -1.24 0.903 48.1% -29 -103 +64 41.5% -0.51 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.02
22 2006 1727 137.0 +0.96 +1.48 1.042 50.6% -72 +110 +30 56.5% +0.19 10–10 (50%) 14–10 (58%) — +0.48 2002 1619 130.3 +1.08 -0.25 1.013 50.6% -10 -111 +6 44.4% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.43
23 2007 1864 150.9 +2.40 +2.23 1.097 51.3% -58 -13 -91 54.4% +0.38 11–10 (52%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.77 2003 1590 113.0 -0.96 -3.38 0.786 45.9% -53 — — 33.3% -1.30 0–6 (0%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.20
24 2008 1876 151.0 +1.44 +3.82 1.154 52.4% -51 +93 +36 58.0% +0.69 13–9 (59%) 13–14 (48%) — +1.79 2004 1733 139.9 +4.02 +2.13 1.223 53.3% -62 -149 +32 63.0% +1.00 1–3 (25%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.92
25 2009 2004 172.3 +4.14 +5.15 1.247 53.9% +20 +44 -100 66.0% +1.22 11–12 (48%) 15–19 (44%) — -0.23 2005 1625 132.1 +0.29 -3.47 0.857 47.8% +4 -99 +170 35.1% -0.60 7–5 (58%) 4–11 (27%) — -0.74
26 2010 1928 161.5 +1.35 +3.83 1.119 52.0% +11 +172 — 59.1% +0.69 18–5 (78%) 17–17 (50%) — +1.41 2006 1609 120.1 +0.77 -0.43 0.981 49.5% -12 -86 — 35.7% -0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.12
27 2011 1931 156.9 +1.76 +2.02 1.077 51.0% -19 +115 -49 55.4% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.03 2007 1641 132.2 +1.45 -1.19 1.018 50.2% -30 -51 +115 44.7% -0.28 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.22
28 2012 1902 158.3 +1.78 +1.64 1.068 50.9% -15 +110 -16 57.3% +0.45 7–6 (54%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.32 2008 1731 142.8 +2.39 -1.86 0.973 49.3% -31 -60 +34 55.0% +0.08 5–6 (45%) 23–15 (61%) — -1.31
29 2013 1897 150.8 +1.90 +1.27 1.077 50.9% -69 +47 +113 54.3% +0.20 11–12 (48%) 14–10 (58%) — -0.19 2009 1741 139.4 +3.47 -1.08 1.087 51.3% +1 — +41 48.6% -0.10 5–2 (71%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.08
30 2014 1880 147.7 +0.99 +0.74 1.048 50.8% -58 +69 +74 55.4% +0.36 11–12 (48%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.67 2010 1881 147.2 +3.24 -1.57 1.032 50.8% -56 -189 +40 58.3% +0.38 3–5 (38%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.02
31 2015 1822 158.0 +2.13 -0.07 1.043 50.6% -12 +53 +115 47.4% +0.18 12–11 (52%) 13–16 (45%) — -2.42 2011 1777 149.5 +1.94 -2.27 0.938 49.2% -37 -84 +194 47.8% -0.17 5–4 (56%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.28
32 2016 1823 157.6 +1.70 +1.52 1.083 51.2% -31 +108 +59 53.3% +0.30 6–12 (33%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.95 2012 1844 157.9 +2.15 -1.12 0.948 48.9% +43 -156 — 46.3% -0.30 3–2 (60%) 10–4 (71%) — -2.17
33 2017 1896 164.3 +0.98 +3.38 1.115 51.7% -12 +46 -99 55.4% +0.30 6–15 (29%) 18–9 (67%) — -2.48 2013 1809 148.4 +2.33 -0.44 1.061 50.8% +25 — +52 52.5% +0.05 0–6 (0%) 7–3 (70%) — -1.76
34 2018 1915 159.9 -0.10 +2.46 1.065 50.9% +25 +13 -172 51.9% +0.27 15–11 (58%) 8–17 (32%) — -1.33 2014 1699 117.2 -0.35 -1.74 0.922 48.9% +10 +3 — 42.9% -0.33 — 2–3 (40%) — +0.81
35 2019 1810 151.6 -0.18 +0.45 0.990 50.1% +22 +37 +5 51.4% +0.28 13–13 (50%) 8–11 (42%) — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1768 132.5 -0.34 -1.01 0.975 49.0% +72 — — 48.5% -0.27 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1627 114.6 -2.83 -1.10 0.807 46.0% — +81 — 25.0% -1.25 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1604 122.9 -3.29 -0.30 0.900 48.1% +74 +90 — 36.6% -0.81 2–4 (33%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2023 1536 96.8 -6.12 -1.90 0.625 40.2% +105 — — 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2128 158.8 +1.50 +2.00 1.077 51.2% -17 +67 -9 54.3% +0.35 175–178 (50%) 214–226 (49%) 97.0 -0.90 — 1903 146.8 +1.98 -1.22 0.996 50.0% -20 -99 +73 48.2% -0.09 42–57 (42%) 100–102 (50%) 99.1 -1.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.