H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fernando Verdasco vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 7-5
Fernando Verdasco holds a 7–5 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 7–4 on clay, while Nicolas Almagro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2015 Bastad third round 6-4 1-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 42
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
7
–
5
12 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2015* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-4 1-6 7-5 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2014* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-3 6-3 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2014* | Houston | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-3 7-6(4) | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Jul 13, 2013* | Bastad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2012* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Nicolas Almagro | 6-3 6-4 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2012* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | QF | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-4 7-6(5) | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Jul 30, 2011* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-7(2) 7-6(2) 6-3 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2011* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | SF | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-4 6-1 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-1 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| May 31, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-2 7-6(4) 7-6(8) | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2007* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-2 7-6(6) | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Jul 20, 2005* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 7-6(4) 6-0 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Verdasco | #893 | #7 | 3,900 | 2,125 | 549 | 441 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Verdasco | Nicolas Almagro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #173 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2005 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2006 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2007 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #26 | 1,864 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2008 | 45–27 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2009 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2010 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2012 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2013 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #30 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #49 | 1,822 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 2016 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #42 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 2017 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,895 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2018 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #49 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2020 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2021 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2022 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2023 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #651 | 1,535 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |