H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 5-2

Fernando Verdasco holds a 5–2 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 4–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2009 Barcelona third round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 23, 2009* Barcelona ATP 500 R32 Clay Fernando Verdasco #7 7-5 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #74 Match data
Aug 1, 2008* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #89 6-3 7-5 Fernando Verdasco #12 Match data
May 8, 2008* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Fernando Verdasco #28 6-2 5-7 6-2 Nicolas Lapentti #74 Match data
Apr 30, 2008* Barcelona ATP 500 R64 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #83 6-3 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #29 Match data
Apr 17, 2008* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Clay Fernando Verdasco #31 5-7 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #98 Match data
Jul 29, 2006* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 QF Clay Fernando Verdasco #24 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #116 Match data
Nov 2, 2005* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Fernando Verdasco #35 6-7(5) 7-5 7-5 Nicolas Lapentti #84 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5
28 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7 — — — — — — —
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —