H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fernando Verdasco vs Paolo Lorenzi H2H: 4-0
Fernando Verdasco holds a 4–0 lead over Paolo Lorenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2019 Doha third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 42
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2019* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Fernando Verdasco | 6-3 6-4 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
| May 8, 2018* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 7-5 6-4 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
| Apr 9, 2015* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-3 4-3 (ret.) | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
| Feb 7, 2015* | Quito | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-1 6-2 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Verdasco | #893 | #7 | 3,900 | 2,125 | 549 | 441 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Paolo Lorenzi | #1,033 | #33 | 1,223 | 1,823 | 104 | 180 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Verdasco | Paolo Lorenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #173 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #26 | 1,864 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 45–27 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #294 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #143 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #30 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #49 | 1,822 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #109 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #42 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2017 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,895 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2018 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2019 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #49 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | 2020 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | 2021 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | 2022 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 39 | 2023 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #651 | 1,535 | 0 | 7 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |