H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 3-4

Radek Stepanek holds a 4–3 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Radek Stepanek leads 3–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2011 Washington quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.

ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 4
7 main draw meetings
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 6, 2011* Washington ATP 500 QF Hard Radek Stepanek #54 6-4 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #19 Match data
Jun 22, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Fernando Verdasco #22 2-6 4-6 6-3 7-6(6) 9-7 Radek Stepanek #60 Match data
Apr 1, 2009* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Fernando Verdasco #9 6-2 6-2 Radek Stepanek #19 Match data
Jan 25, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Fernando Verdasco #15 6-4 6-0 6-0 Radek Stepanek #23 Match data
Jan 11, 2009* Brisbane ATP 250 F Hard Radek Stepanek #26 3-6 6-3 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #15 Match data
Jul 5, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Radek Stepanek #13 6-7(4) 6-3 4-6 6-4 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #30 Match data
Mar 24, 2004* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Radek Stepanek #52 7-6(6) 7-6(3) Fernando Verdasco #69 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7