H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Robin Soderling H2H: 2-5

Robin Soderling holds a 5–2 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Robin Soderling leads 3–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin Soderling won the 2011 Rome Masters third round 2-6 7-5 6-4.

ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 5
7 main draw meetings
SWE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 11, 2011* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Robin Soderling #5 2-6 7-5 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #17 Match data
Apr 25, 2010* Barcelona ATP 500 F Clay Fernando Verdasco #9 6-3 4-6 6-3 Robin Soderling #8 Match data
Jul 24, 2008* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Robin Soderling #49 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #11 Match data
Feb 22, 2008* Rotterdam ATP 500 R16 Hard Robin Soderling #59 6-4 6-1 Fernando Verdasco #30 Match data
Jul 13, 2007* Bastad ATP 250 R16 Clay Robin Soderling #26 6-3 5-7 7-6(4) Fernando Verdasco #42 Match data
Aug 25, 2005* New Haven ATP 250 R32 Hard Fernando Verdasco #48 7-6(3) 7-6(4) Robin Soderling #41 Match data
May 25, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Robin Soderling #35 1-6 3-6 6-3 6-3 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Robin Soderling #195 #4 6,055 2,172 285 166 63.2% 0 1 0 2 7 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Robin Soderling
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #444 1,518 0 0
17 2002 1–5 16.7% #163 1,554 0 0
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0 2003 10–6 62.5% #60 1,728 0 0
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0 2004 31–26 54.4% #34 1,824 0 1
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1 2005 16–18 47.1% #77 1,737 0 2
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1 2006 33–22 60.0% #25 1,823 0 2
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 2007 22–15 59.5% #41 1,831 0 2
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 2008 40–19 67.8% #17 1,959 0 3
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2 2009 44–23 65.7% #8 2,070 0 4
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3 2010 53–22 70.7% #5 2,118 0 6
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5 2011 34–9 79.1% #13 2,127 0 10
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7