H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Fernando Verdasco vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-1
Fernando Verdasco and Sergiy Stakhovsky are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 1–0 on clay, while Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sergiy Stakhovsky won the 2013 St. Petersburg third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 42
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2013* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 6-4 | Fernando Verdasco | Match data |
| May 21, 2010* | Nice | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Verdasco | #893 | #7 | 3,900 | 2,125 | 549 | 441 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Fernando Verdasco | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #173 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #26 | 1,864 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2008 | 45–27 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2009 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #30 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #49 | 1,822 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #42 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,895 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #49 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #651 | 1,535 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |