H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Fernando Verdasco vs Steve Darcis H2H: 4-0
Fernando Verdasco holds a 4–0 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2019 Metz third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 42
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2019* | Metz | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Fernando Verdasco | 6-2 6-2 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
| Jun 30, 2017* | Antalya | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Fernando Verdasco | 6-3 6-4 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
| May 29, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-3 6-2 7-6(4) | Steve Darcis | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2012* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-3 6-1 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Verdasco | #893 | #7 | 3,900 | 2,125 | 549 | 441 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Verdasco | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #173 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #26 | 1,864 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 45–27 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2009 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2010 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2012 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2013 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #30 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #49 | 1,822 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2016 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #42 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2017 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,895 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2018 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #49 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 2020 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2021 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2022 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2023 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #651 | 1,535 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |