H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 2-1

Fernando Verdasco holds a 2–1 lead over Thomas Johansson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on carpet, while Fernando Verdasco leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2007 Japan Open third round 7-6(4) 5-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Thomas Johansson
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Verdasco #32 7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 Thomas Johansson #55 Match data Oct 5, 2007* R16 Japan Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Thomas Johansson #15 6-3 3-6 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #39 Match data Oct 29, 2005* SF St. Petersburg ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Fernando Verdasco #40 6-1 6-4 Thomas Johansson #97 Match data Jul 8, 2004* R32 Swedish Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,127 549 442 55.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 337 279 54.7% 1 1 0 0 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Thomas Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0 1993 2–1 66.7% — 1,534 0 0
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,591 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,730 0 1 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,491 0 0
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,790 0 1 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,700 0 2
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,897 0 2
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,875 0 2 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,736 0 3
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,003 0 3 2000 22–26 45.8% #39 1,819 0 4
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,927 0 5 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,931 0 5 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,745 1 7
28 2012 32–22 59.3% #24 1,901 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,896 0 5 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,853 1 8
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,879 0 6 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,706 1 9
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,823 0 7 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,756 1 9
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 2008 12–18 40.0% #136 1,668 1 9
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,914 0 7 — — — — — — —
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Verdasco Thomas Johansson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2002 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 20 11 31 64.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2005 14 12 26 53.8% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6%
22 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 17 9 26 65.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 15 13 28 53.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 15 5 20 75.0%
23 2007 18 14 32 56.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1998 27 14 41 65.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1%
24 2008 20 16 36 55.6% 17 8 25 68.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2009 35 15 50 70.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2000 17 17 34 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2010 21 13 34 61.8% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 11 1 12 91.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2011 19 14 33 57.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 17 12 29 58.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2012 11 10 21 52.4% 19 10 29 65.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 9 13 22 40.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2004 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
30 2014 11 11 22 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 19 14 33 57.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 3 13 76.9% 9 2 11 81.8%
31 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2006 5 7 12 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
32 2016 13 15 28 46.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
33 2017 18 15 33 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
34 2018 18 14 32 56.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 13 14 27 48.1% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2023 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 259 235 494 52.4% 231 156 387 59.7% 51 44 95 53.7% 8 7 15 53.3% — 197 155 352 56.0% 29 58 87 33.3% 46 30 76 60.5% 65 36 101 64.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/991 of Fernando Verdasco's and 214/218 of Thomas Johansson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Verdasco Thomas Johansson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2002 3/3 1.7 6.3 71.8% 56.3% 32.1% 54.4% 39.3% 49.7% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 18/19 5.0 4.3 64.8% 68.3% 55.7% 51.0% 42.6% 63.8% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 56/56 4.8 3.2 66.0% 71.0% 56.3% 65.5% 40.6% 65.7% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 61/61 6.6 3.7 65.1% 72.5% 51.7% 60.0% 44.5% 65.2% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 56/56 3.9 3.8 72.5% 68.7% 49.7% 62.8% 43.6% 63.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 59/59 4.6 3.4 72.4% 70.2% 52.2% 55.3% 38.6% 65.1% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 72/72 3.8 4.1 72.6% 69.3% 53.0% 55.6% 47.6% 64.7% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 75/75 6.1 3.7 69.1% 73.1% 54.3% 62.2% 46.5% 67.1% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 64/64 5.4 4.8 67.1% 71.2% 49.4% 60.0% 44.6% 64.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 58/58 5.5 3.9 68.8% 70.7% 51.3% 61.5% 44.9% 64.6% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 53/54 4.6 3.8 69.7% 69.7% 51.4% 64.4% 42.1% 64.1% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 50/51 5.9 5.0 61.7% 72.8% 54.0% 56.4% 36.3% 65.3% 37.4% 2004 49/49 9.3 2.1 55.5% 77.2% 52.5% 62.8% 42.3% 66.2% 36.3%
30 2014 46/46 5.7 4.7 66.3% 71.7% 51.8% 65.6% 43.2% 64.5% 37.3% 2005 66/66 8.9 2.0 56.8% 77.3% 55.7% 59.6% 40.9% 68.0% 36.5%
31 2015 50/50 7.7 4.1 64.6% 73.5% 52.3% 60.8% 35.2% 66.1% 35.3% 2006 26/27 10.2 2.8 56.6% 75.4% 50.5% 61.8% 40.1% 64.6% 33.3%
32 2016 55/55 6.3 3.9 64.0% 73.2% 51.4% 62.1% 38.4% 65.1% 37.8% 2007 46/46 8.4 2.5 57.6% 74.9% 51.6% 60.3% 42.1% 65.1% 32.1%
33 2017 54/54 4.0 3.4 69.0% 70.6% 51.0% 53.7% 45.7% 64.6% 39.5% 2008 27/30 7.4 2.8 58.4% 72.2% 47.4% 60.8% 38.1% 61.8% 33.5%
34 2018 61/61 6.7 4.2 63.1% 72.0% 48.7% 59.3% 42.9% 63.4% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 53/53 7.7 3.7 63.8% 71.8% 49.4% 62.4% 40.0% 63.7% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 13/13 6.3 2.6 67.5% 68.9% 49.5% 59.7% 29.5% 62.7% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 10/10 3.9 3.2 66.9% 60.7% 48.4% 54.2% 28.3% 56.6% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 16/16 4.3 2.9 63.4% 66.0% 48.6% 58.4% 37.6% 59.8% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2023 5/5 1.0 4.0 62.6% 53.7% 32.4% 36.3% 45.3% 45.6% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/991 5.5 3.9 67.3% 70.9% 51.6% 59.9% 42.1% 64.4% 38.3% — 214/616 8.9 2.3 56.9% 75.9% 52.4% 60.9% 41.0% 65.8% 34.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Verdasco Thomas Johansson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2002 1502 102.0 -2.56 -2.05 0.736 44.2% — +27 — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — +0.02 1993 1535 112.9 — — — — +33 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.12
19 2003 1592 125.8 +1.64 -0.91 0.950 48.7% +9 -89 — 39.6% -0.77 2–4 (33%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.48 1994 1496 98.1 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 1–1 — +0.29
20 2004 1731 140.6 +2.76 +0.54 1.085 51.4% -84 +24 -92 53.2% +0.29 6–8 (43%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.34 1995 1492 111.1 — — — — +52 — — 22.2% -1.56 — 0–1 — -0.10
21 2005 1791 146.9 +2.51 +2.36 1.116 51.9% -27 +11 -149 55.1% +0.46 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) — -2.07 1996 1764 141.3 — — — — -11 -212 -55 54.7% +0.46 10–7 (59%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.21
22 2006 1727 137.0 +0.96 +1.48 1.042 50.6% -72 +110 +30 56.5% +0.19 10–10 (50%) 14–10 (58%) — +0.48 1997 1700 139.6 — — — — +91 -202 -7 52.7% +0.37 11–10 (52%) 3–17 (15%) — +2.54
23 2007 1864 150.9 +2.40 +2.23 1.097 51.3% -58 -13 -91 54.4% +0.38 11–10 (52%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.77 1998 1897 149.9 — — — — +15 -423 -194 57.3% +0.51 12–13 (48%) 22–20 (52%) — -1.44
24 2008 1876 151.0 +1.44 +3.82 1.154 52.4% -51 +93 +36 58.0% +0.69 13–9 (59%) 13–14 (48%) — +1.79 1999 1736 138.9 — — — — +44 -276 — 50.9% -0.01 9–9 (50%) 8–8 (50%) — +1.29
25 2009 2004 172.3 +4.14 +5.15 1.247 53.9% +20 +44 -100 66.0% +1.22 11–12 (48%) 15–19 (44%) — -0.23 2000 1819 138.5 — — — — -4 -362 -90 50.0% +0.02 5–7 (42%) 17–12 (59%) — -0.07
26 2010 1928 161.5 +1.35 +3.83 1.119 52.0% +11 +172 — 59.1% +0.69 18–5 (78%) 17–17 (50%) — +1.41 2001 1875 151.0 — — — — -19 -371 -11 61.5% +0.73 9–9 (50%) 15–12 (56%) — -2.47
27 2011 1931 156.9 +1.76 +2.02 1.077 51.0% -19 +115 -49 55.4% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.03 2002 1746 143.8 — — — — +68 -189 +40 53.6% +0.32 8–8 (50%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.26
28 2012 1902 158.3 +1.78 +1.64 1.068 50.9% -15 +110 -16 57.3% +0.45 7–6 (54%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1897 150.8 +1.90 +1.27 1.077 50.9% -69 +47 +113 54.3% +0.20 11–12 (48%) 14–10 (58%) — -0.19 2004 1854 148.2 +3.00 +0.83 1.073 51.2% +2 -283 +23 56.9% +0.25 8–8 (50%) 18–11 (62%) — -2.69
30 2014 1880 147.7 +0.99 +0.74 1.048 50.8% -58 +69 +74 55.4% +0.36 11–12 (48%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.67 2005 1893 147.3 +4.53 -0.04 1.141 52.0% -3 -302 +122 61.8% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 22–15 (59%) — +0.08
31 2015 1822 158.0 +2.13 -0.07 1.043 50.6% -12 +53 +115 47.4% +0.18 12–11 (52%) 13–16 (45%) — -2.42 2006 1706 134.4 +1.47 -2.65 0.941 49.2% +107 -165 +193 41.4% -0.30 4–5 (44%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.60
32 2016 1823 157.6 +1.70 +1.52 1.083 51.2% -31 +108 +59 53.3% +0.30 6–12 (33%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.95 2007 1757 138.7 +0.88 -2.95 0.918 48.8% +47 -210 +10 45.9% -0.46 7–5 (58%) 14–13 (52%) — -2.55
33 2017 1896 164.3 +0.98 +3.38 1.115 51.7% -12 +46 -99 55.4% +0.30 6–15 (29%) 18–9 (67%) — -2.48 2008 1668 132.9 -0.51 -1.77 0.876 47.7% +18 -129 +90 34.8% -0.74 4–2 (67%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.34
34 2018 1915 159.9 -0.10 +2.46 1.065 50.9% +25 +13 -172 51.9% +0.27 15–11 (58%) 8–17 (32%) — -1.33 2009 1652 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1810 151.6 -0.18 +0.45 0.990 50.1% +22 +37 +5 51.4% +0.28 13–13 (50%) 8–11 (42%) — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1768 132.5 -0.34 -1.01 0.975 49.0% +72 — — 48.5% -0.27 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1627 114.6 -2.83 -1.10 0.807 46.0% — +81 — 25.0% -1.25 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1604 122.9 -3.29 -0.30 0.900 48.1% +74 +90 — 36.6% -0.81 2–4 (33%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2023 1536 96.8 -6.12 -1.90 0.625 40.2% +105 — — 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2128 158.8 +1.50 +2.00 1.077 51.2% -17 +67 -9 54.3% +0.35 175–178 (50%) 214–226 (49%) 97.0 -0.90 — 1969 149.0 +2.39 -1.00 1.014 50.2% +27 -268 +7 53.4% +0.24 98–93 (51%) 151–153 (50%) 99.5 -0.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.