H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Fernando Verdasco vs Tomas Zib H2H: 1-0
Fernando Verdasco holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Zib in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Verdasco leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2005 Palermo third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 42
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Verdasco | 6-2 6-2 | Tomas Zib | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2003* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q3 | Grass | Fernando Verdasco | 6-4 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Tomas Zib | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Verdasco | #893 | #7 | 3,900 | 2,125 | 549 | 441 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Verdasco | Tomas Zib | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #173 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #26 | 1,864 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 45–27 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #30 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #49 | 1,822 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #42 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2017 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,895 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2018 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #49 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2020 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2021 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2022 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2023 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #651 | 1,535 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |