H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Fernando Verdasco vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 3-0
Fernando Verdasco holds a 3–0 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2007 New Haven third round 2-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 42
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2007* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Fernando Verdasco | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Fernando Verdasco | 3-6 6-4 7-6(1) 6-3 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2006* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Fernando Verdasco | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Verdasco | #893 | #7 | 3,900 | 2,125 | 549 | 441 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Fernando Verdasco | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #173 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #26 | 1,864 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 45–27 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #30 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #49 | 1,822 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #42 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,895 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #49 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #651 | 1,535 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |