H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Fernando Vicente vs David Prinosil H2H: 2-0
Fernando Vicente holds a 2–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fernando Vicente leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Vicente won the 1999 Lyon second round 0-6 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 1999* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Fernando Vicente | 0-6 6-4 7-6(5) | David Prinosil | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Fernando Vicente | 6-4 6-3 2-6 6-4 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Vicente | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |