H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Fernando Vicente vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 0-1
Fabrice Santoro holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Vicente in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fabrice Santoro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 2000 Sydney Olympics third round 6-1 6-7(2) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2000* | Sydney Olympics | Olympics | R32 | Hard | Fabrice Santoro | 6-1 6-7(2) 7-5 | Fernando Vicente | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 159 | 213 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Fabrice Santoro | #142 | #17 | 1,516 | 1,890 | 462 | 435 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Vicente | Fabrice Santoro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #43 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #102 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #29 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,601 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #31 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,507 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,482 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,488 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #58 | 1,781 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #52 | 1,701 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,788 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #52 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,696 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,689 | 0 | 6 |