H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Fernando Vicente vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 1-1
Fernando Vicente and Guillermo Canas are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2004 Umag fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2004* | Umag | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 6-2 6-1 | Fernando Vicente | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1997* | Bogota | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Vicente | 2-6 6-1 6-1 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Vicente | Guillermo Canas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |