H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Fernando Vicente vs Harel Levy H2H: 1-1
Fernando Vicente and Harel Levy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fernando Vicente leads 1–0 on clay, while Harel Levy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Vicente won the 2001 Mallorca third round 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2001* | Mallorca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Vicente | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Harel Levy | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Harel Levy | 4-6 6-3 6-3 6-1 | Fernando Vicente | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Harel Levy | #1,024 | #30 | 1,023 | 1,732 | 43 | 83 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Vicente | Harel Levy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #78 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #111 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #247 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #342 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |