H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fernando Vicente vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 2-1
Fernando Vicente holds a 2–1 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Fernando Vicente leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Vicente won the 1999 Roland Garros first round 5-7 6-2 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Fernando Vicente | 5-7 6-2 6-3 6-3 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1999* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Fernando Vicente | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
| Jan 8, 1999* | Doha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jeff Tarango | 6-3 7-5 | Fernando Vicente | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jeff Tarango | #1,001 | #42 | 877 | 1,787 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Vicente | Jeff Tarango | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #377 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #96 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #131 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #78 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #73 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #323 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #730 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 |