H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Fernando Vicente vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 0-1
Justin Gimelstob holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Vicente in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Justin Gimelstob leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justin Gimelstob won the 1999 Scottsdale fourth round 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 1999* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Justin Gimelstob | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Fernando Vicente | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Vicente | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |