H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Fernando Vicente vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 0-1

Justin Gimelstob holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Vicente in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Justin Gimelstob leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justin Gimelstob won the 1999 Scottsdale round of 16 7-6(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Vicente
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Justin Gimelstob #68 7-6(5) 6-2 Fernando Vicente #62 Match data Mar 5, 1999* R16 Scottsdale ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Vicente #1,019 #29 993 1,762 159 213 42.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Justin Gimelstob #841 #63 733 1,722 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Vicente Justin Gimelstob
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% — 1,529 0 0
19 1996 3–3 50.0% #151 1,548 0 0 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,510 0 0
20 1997 9–12 42.9% #121 1,561 0 0 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0
21 1998 20–20 50.0% #54 1,649 0 0 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0
22 1999 25–29 46.3% #49 1,636 0 1 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0
23 2000 24–32 42.9% #47 1,618 0 2 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,675 0 0
24 2001 23–26 46.9% #52 1,638 0 3 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,595 0 0
25 2002 23–28 45.1% #58 1,618 0 3 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0
26 2003 20–29 40.8% #63 1,601 0 3 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,532 0 0
27 2004 4–5 44.4% #187 1,594 0 3 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,507 0 0
28 2005 3–5 37.5% #110 1,614 0 3 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0
29 2006 5–17 22.7% #111 1,461 0 3 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0
30 2007 0–5 0.0% #168 1,507 0 3 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,537 0 0
31 2008 0–1 0.0% #206 1,482 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2009 0–1 0.0% #420 1,488 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Vicente Justin Gimelstob
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 1997 — — — — 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — — — — — 1997 15 16 31 48.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 19 17 36 52.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1999 4 11 15 26.7% 19 16 35 54.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 13 16 29 44.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 15 14 29 51.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 10 9 19 52.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
24 2001 7 9 16 43.8% 16 15 31 51.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 12 13 25 48.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2002 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2003 7 12 19 36.8% 9 13 22 40.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 2004 — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2005 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2005 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2006 0 5 5 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
30 2007 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 39 64 103 37.9% 113 128 241 46.9% 5 12 17 29.4% 2 9 11 18.2% — 71 112 183 38.8% 8 17 25 32.0% 24 35 59 40.7% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 327/372 of Fernando Vicente's and 259/278 of Justin Gimelstob's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Vicente Justin Gimelstob
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/2 8.0 5.0 62.7% 69.5% 44.6% 68.1% 31.7% 59.4% 30.5%
19 1996 4/6 1.0 2.0 70.7% 62.9% 53.7% 34.5% 38.4% 59.4% 45.4% 1996 10/12 5.1 3.4 54.9% 73.3% 46.5% 41.8% 50.8% 61.4% 35.3%
20 1997 18/21 1.1 2.7 62.5% 64.6% 47.0% 58.3% 48.0% 57.7% 45.2% 1997 36/40 6.0 5.8 58.7% 71.8% 44.8% 51.3% 37.8% 60.5% 35.9%
21 1998 32/40 2.2 2.7 61.9% 62.8% 50.4% 55.1% 44.5% 58.1% 40.8% 1998 26/29 5.5 3.9 59.7% 72.6% 47.9% 55.6% 44.3% 62.5% 39.5%
22 1999 47/54 2.3 3.2 59.8% 66.6% 48.9% 55.3% 46.2% 59.5% 42.0% 1999 37/43 6.9 3.9 60.4% 72.2% 47.6% 56.4% 39.5% 62.4% 35.7%
23 2000 44/56 3.0 3.7 59.2% 66.8% 49.6% 53.0% 41.6% 60.0% 38.9% 2000 29/30 8.3 4.4 58.7% 73.7% 49.6% 57.8% 36.8% 63.2% 37.6%
24 2001 43/49 3.7 3.6 57.7% 69.0% 47.2% 52.5% 48.3% 59.3% 39.6% 2001 13/15 5.6 5.7 55.5% 71.2% 45.9% 45.8% 36.3% 59.8% 34.1%
25 2002 44/51 3.2 1.9 57.4% 67.3% 50.1% 58.6% 46.0% 59.9% 37.2% 2002 10/11 5.5 5.7 53.9% 69.8% 43.4% 49.0% 29.6% 57.9% 37.0%
26 2003 49/49 4.6 2.6 56.4% 68.0% 48.1% 59.2% 43.5% 59.1% 34.8% 2003 26/26 7.3 4.2 54.5% 73.8% 45.2% 63.5% 42.7% 60.7% 36.5%
27 2004 9/9 2.8 1.8 58.8% 63.6% 44.2% 55.6% 42.7% 55.7% 35.8% 2004 6/6 4.5 5.5 48.7% 73.2% 49.4% 40.7% 26.3% 60.7% 35.9%
28 2005 8/8 4.4 2.3 56.9% 64.0% 51.0% 64.0% 35.5% 58.2% 40.7% 2005 17/17 11.4 4.9 56.8% 77.1% 52.2% 59.4% 40.1% 66.2% 35.8%
29 2006 22/22 3.0 1.6 64.9% 63.7% 50.1% 53.1% 39.1% 58.8% 36.7% 2006 34/34 7.0 2.9 56.6% 72.4% 47.8% 63.7% 36.2% 61.7% 34.9%
30 2007 5/5 1.4 1.2 70.3% 56.6% 39.1% 52.8% 24.0% 51.3% 25.5% 2007 13/13 4.3 4.8 57.1% 65.3% 43.1% 49.5% 26.4% 55.8% 29.5%
31 2008 1/1 0.0 1.0 50.0% 61.8% 44.1% 50.0% 28.6% 52.9% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1/1 1.0 2.0 62.2% 30.4% 28.6% 14.3% 0.0% 29.7% 27.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 327/372 3.0 2.8 59.5% 66.1% 48.7% 55.4% 43.9% 58.9% 38.8% — 259/278 6.8 4.4 57.4% 72.4% 47.1% 55.6% 38.2% 61.5% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Vicente Justin Gimelstob
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1530 110.0 -1.36 +1.92 0.750 45.8% — — — 37.5% -0.63 1–0 — — -0.13
19 1996 1548 120.0 +0.84 +2.51 1.118 52.2% — +29 — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.41 1996 1510 118.9 +0.13 +0.36 0.915 48.2% +28 — — 29.6% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.63
20 1997 1562 130.5 -1.52 +3.50 1.070 51.3% — +52 — 44.4% -0.33 1–6 (14%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.43 1997 1630 134.5 -1.35 -0.78 0.909 48.5% +30 — -55 43.3% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 10–8 (56%) 103.8 +0.60
21 1998 1650 137.4 -2.98 +1.59 0.974 49.6% -108 +65 — 44.3% -0.11 10–5 (67%) 4–10 (29%) 103.1 -0.14 1998 1661 129.0 +0.39 +1.22 1.052 50.8% -10 -75 -71 50.7% +0.12 6–8 (43%) 4–9 (31%) 96.0 -0.12
22 1999 1637 138.5 -1.44 +2.23 1.037 50.6% -86 +109 — 45.6% -0.18 8–6 (57%) 7–12 (37%) 98.8 +0.65 1999 1645 137.7 -0.21 -1.19 0.949 49.1% +36 -75 -122 45.0% -0.28 3–10 (23%) 7–12 (37%) 91.8 -1.22
23 2000 1618 135.8 -1.81 +1.17 0.972 49.6% -34 +61 — 44.7% -0.20 13–15 (46%) 10–12 (45%) 100.4 -0.23 2000 1675 126.8 +0.05 +0.25 1.022 50.4% +34 -174 -115 47.5% -0.40 5–7 (42%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 +0.17
24 2001 1639 132.0 -1.82 +1.08 0.972 49.5% -18 +32 — 45.5% -0.38 10–9 (53%) 12–6 (67%) 103.8 +0.90 2001 1596 108.5 -1.35 -2.71 0.849 47.0% +17 — -76 29.3% -1.39 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.32
25 2002 1618 136.2 -2.20 -0.59 0.927 48.9% +13 +77 — 46.2% -0.27 8–8 (50%) 7–12 (37%) 96.3 0.00 2002 1620 119.3 -1.95 +1.16 0.880 46.9% +9 — -59 40.7% -0.81 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.03
26 2003 1602 129.5 -1.76 -2.08 0.852 47.4% +2 +46 -97 41.3% -0.65 9–7 (56%) 9–9 (50%) 104.2 -2.16 2003 1532 117.2 -2.07 -0.87 0.929 48.9% +13 — +76 40.0% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 95.7 +1.70
27 2004 1594 106.7 -3.53 -0.58 0.807 45.9% — +61 — 41.7% -1.33 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 102.1 +0.13 2004 1507 110.1 -0.55 -0.52 0.913 47.3% +4 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — -0.42
28 2005 1614 114.5 -1.62 +0.57 0.973 49.5% — +61 — 41.7% -0.25 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.35 2005 1596 127.5 +2.04 +0.31 1.059 51.1% -56 — +71 48.9% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 6–7 (46%) 99.7 -0.05
29 2006 1462 116.7 -2.31 -0.86 0.891 47.8% +46 +92 +90 32.1% -1.21 0–8 (0%) 2–4 (33%) 90.0 +0.66 2006 1606 122.4 -0.69 -1.72 0.913 49.0% -77 -132 +106 44.9% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 100.7 +0.54
30 2007 1508 103.6 -3.76 -5.30 0.523 39.6% — 0 — 7.7% -3.62 0–1 1–0 — 0.00 2007 1537 116.4 -4.94 -3.75 0.668 43.5% -37 — +128 10.0% -2.37 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
31 2008 1483 99.3 -2.70 -2.66 0.907 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1488 93.1 -1.57 -0.72 0.395 28.8% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1471 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1763 134.5 -1.98 +0.46 0.943 49.0% -22 +64 -35 43.1% -0.44 63–68 (48%) 62–72 (46%) 98.5 -0.12 — 1722 132.5 -0.75 -0.68 0.933 48.8% +5 -103 -6 41.7% -0.51 35–56 (38%) 51–68 (43%) 92.8 +0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.