H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Fernando Vicente vs Leander Paes H2H: 1-0

Fernando Vicente holds a 1–0 lead over Leander Paes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Vicente leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Vicente won the 2000 Dubai Tennis Championships round of 32 6-0 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Vicente
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Leander Paes
IND Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Vicente #47 6-0 4-6 6-3 Leander Paes #140 Match data Feb 10, 2000* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Vicente #1,019 #29 993 1,762 159 213 42.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Leander Paes #1,102 #73 611 1,737 53 77 40.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Vicente Leander Paes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1991 1–2 33.3% #278 1,492 0 0
19 1996 3–3 50.0% #151 1,548 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #194 1,486 0 0
20 1997 9–12 42.9% #121 1,561 0 0 1993 1–3 25.0% #260 1,483 0 0
21 1998 20–20 50.0% #54 1,649 0 0 1994 2–3 40.0% #139 1,495 0 0
22 1999 25–29 46.3% #49 1,636 0 1 1995 3–9 25.0% #130 1,486 0 0
23 2000 24–32 42.9% #47 1,618 0 2 1996 13–11 54.2% #129 1,654 0 0
24 2001 23–26 46.9% #52 1,638 0 3 1997 13–18 41.9% #122 1,634 0 0
25 2002 23–28 45.1% #58 1,618 0 3 1998 13–10 56.5% #91 1,659 0 1
26 2003 20–29 40.8% #63 1,601 0 3 1999 3–9 25.0% #142 1,562 0 1
27 2004 4–5 44.4% #187 1,594 0 3 2000 3–6 33.3% #188 1,537 0 1
28 2005 3–5 37.5% #110 1,614 0 3 2001 1–2 33.3% #299 1,595 0 1
29 2006 5–17 22.7% #111 1,461 0 3 2002 0–1 0.0% #998 1,579 0 1
30 2007 0–5 0.0% #168 1,507 0 3 2003 0–1 0.0% #1032 1,571 0 1
31 2008 0–1 0.0% #206 1,482 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2009 0–1 0.0% #420 1,488 0 3 2005 0–1 0.0% #1102 1,550 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Vicente Leander Paes
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1997 — — — — 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — — — — — 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 19 17 36 52.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1999 4 11 15 26.7% 19 16 35 54.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 15 14 29 51.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2001 7 9 16 43.8% 16 15 31 51.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0%
25 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 12 13 25 48.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2003 7 12 19 36.8% 9 13 22 40.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2004 — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2005 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2006 0 5 5 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 39 64 103 37.9% 113 128 241 46.9% 5 12 17 29.4% 2 9 11 18.2% — 25 50 75 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 18 13 31 58.1% 9 10 19 47.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 327/372 of Fernando Vicente's and 106/129 of Leander Paes's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Vicente Leander Paes
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 3/3 3.0 3.7 58.6% 71.0% 47.9% 77.5% 23.3% 61.5% 35.9%
19 1996 4/6 1.0 2.0 70.7% 62.9% 53.7% 34.5% 38.4% 59.4% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 18/21 1.1 2.7 62.5% 64.6% 47.0% 58.3% 48.0% 57.7% 45.2% 1993 4/4 3.0 4.8 66.2% 67.5% 51.2% 45.8% 42.6% 61.8% 38.1%
21 1998 32/40 2.2 2.7 61.9% 62.8% 50.4% 55.1% 44.5% 58.1% 40.8% 1994 4/5 3.0 4.0 58.1% 73.3% 37.5% 40.8% 32.0% 58.1% 38.2%
22 1999 47/54 2.3 3.2 59.8% 66.6% 48.9% 55.3% 46.2% 59.5% 42.0% 1995 11/12 2.9 3.8 61.2% 64.3% 45.8% 55.8% 32.3% 57.2% 32.9%
23 2000 44/56 3.0 3.7 59.2% 66.8% 49.6% 53.0% 41.6% 60.0% 38.9% 1996 16/24 4.2 3.7 61.2% 68.8% 47.3% 55.1% 40.0% 60.6% 38.4%
24 2001 43/49 3.7 3.6 57.7% 69.0% 47.2% 52.5% 48.3% 59.3% 39.6% 1997 25/31 3.6 3.8 61.6% 74.3% 49.6% 58.7% 39.3% 64.9% 36.6%
25 2002 44/51 3.2 1.9 57.4% 67.3% 50.1% 58.6% 46.0% 59.9% 37.2% 1998 20/23 4.1 2.9 58.7% 71.2% 53.2% 70.8% 45.8% 63.8% 38.1%
26 2003 49/49 4.6 2.6 56.4% 68.0% 48.1% 59.2% 43.5% 59.1% 34.8% 1999 10/12 3.4 4.4 56.2% 71.4% 50.7% 61.7% 31.5% 62.2% 33.4%
27 2004 9/9 2.8 1.8 58.8% 63.6% 44.2% 55.6% 42.7% 55.7% 35.8% 2000 7/9 4.0 4.3 61.1% 65.9% 46.3% 44.5% 26.8% 58.0% 29.9%
28 2005 8/8 4.4 2.3 56.9% 64.0% 51.0% 64.0% 35.5% 58.2% 40.7% 2001 3/3 8.7 7.3 58.3% 70.9% 42.7% 53.6% 31.8% 59.1% 30.1%
29 2006 22/22 3.0 1.6 64.9% 63.7% 50.1% 53.1% 39.1% 58.8% 36.7% 2002 1/1 5.0 1.0 55.0% 54.5% 55.6% 20.0% — 55.0% 28.3%
30 2007 5/5 1.4 1.2 70.3% 56.6% 39.1% 52.8% 24.0% 51.3% 25.5% 2003 1/1 0.0 8.0 58.4% 61.0% 50.0% 66.7% 42.9% 56.4% 37.6%
31 2008 1/1 0.0 1.0 50.0% 61.8% 44.1% 50.0% 28.6% 52.9% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1/1 1.0 2.0 62.2% 30.4% 28.6% 14.3% 0.0% 29.7% 27.8% 2005 1/1 2.0 0.0 60.0% 66.7% 41.7% 42.9% 66.7% 56.7% 27.6%
Career — 327/372 3.0 2.8 59.5% 66.1% 48.7% 55.4% 43.9% 58.9% 38.8% — 106/130 3.8 3.8 60.2% 70.2% 48.7% 58.3% 37.5% 61.7% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Vicente Leander Paes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1493 103.0 -1.66 +0.58 0.932 49.1% +36 — — 28.6% -0.43 1–0 0–1 — +0.26
19 1996 1548 120.0 +0.84 +2.51 1.118 52.2% — +29 — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.41 1992 1486 102.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.04
20 1997 1562 130.5 -1.52 +3.50 1.070 51.3% — +52 — 44.4% -0.33 1–6 (14%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.43 1993 1483 104.5 -0.63 +0.03 0.998 49.6% +25 — — 36.4% -0.18 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.15
21 1998 1650 137.4 -2.98 +1.59 0.974 49.6% -108 +65 — 44.3% -0.11 10–5 (67%) 4–10 (29%) 103.1 -0.14 1994 1496 104.2 -1.44 -1.83 0.912 47.8% +3 — — 41.7% -0.92 0–1 2–0 — +0.34
22 1999 1637 138.5 -1.44 +2.23 1.037 50.6% -86 +109 — 45.6% -0.18 8–6 (57%) 7–12 (37%) 98.8 +0.65 1995 1486 109.8 -2.61 -2.49 0.768 45.6% +14 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.3 +0.09
23 2000 1618 135.8 -1.81 +1.17 0.972 49.6% -34 +61 — 44.7% -0.20 13–15 (46%) 10–12 (45%) 100.4 -0.23 1996 1655 129.5 -1.01 -0.14 0.975 49.4% -32 — -11 50.0% -0.11 4–1 (80%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.13
24 2001 1639 132.0 -1.82 +1.08 0.972 49.5% -18 +32 — 45.5% -0.38 10–9 (53%) 12–6 (67%) 103.8 +0.90 1997 1634 115.9 +1.36 -1.27 1.044 50.5% -37 -94 +43 43.0% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 4–9 (31%) 96.3 +1.81
25 2002 1618 136.2 -2.20 -0.59 0.927 48.9% +13 +77 — 46.2% -0.27 8–8 (50%) 7–12 (37%) 96.3 0.00 1998 1660 131.9 +0.72 +0.24 1.053 51.4% -30 — +69 51.0% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.3 +1.30
26 2003 1602 129.5 -1.76 -2.08 0.852 47.4% +2 +46 -97 41.3% -0.65 9–7 (56%) 9–9 (50%) 104.2 -2.16 1999 1562 108.9 -1.02 -2.19 0.884 47.9% -19 — +132 25.0% -1.18 1–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.75
27 2004 1594 106.7 -3.53 -0.58 0.807 45.9% — +61 — 41.7% -1.33 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 102.1 +0.13 2000 1538 104.1 -1.46 -3.99 0.711 44.3% +15 — — 36.4% -1.23 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.88
28 2005 1614 114.5 -1.62 +0.57 0.973 49.5% — +61 — 41.7% -0.25 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.35 2001 1596 106.9 -0.83 -2.86 0.736 45.8% — — — 33.3% -0.67 — 0–1 — +0.48
29 2006 1462 116.7 -2.31 -0.86 0.891 47.8% +46 +92 +90 32.1% -1.21 0–8 (0%) 2–4 (33%) 90.0 +0.66 2002 1579 97.0 -2.95 -4.40 0.628 40.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
30 2007 1508 103.6 -3.76 -5.30 0.523 39.6% — 0 — 7.7% -3.62 0–1 1–0 — 0.00 2003 1572 104.5 +2.28 -1.66 0.864 47.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.16
31 2008 1483 99.3 -2.70 -2.66 0.907 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1488 93.1 -1.57 -0.72 0.395 28.8% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.06 2005 1551 95.8 -1.30 -1.39 0.637 42.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.29
33 2010 1471 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1763 134.5 -1.98 +0.46 0.943 49.0% -22 +64 -35 43.1% -0.44 63–68 (48%) 62–72 (46%) 98.5 -0.12 — 1738 121.9 -0.33 -1.21 0.934 48.8% -15 -94 +47 40.3% -0.54 14–15 (48%) 20–31 (39%) 96.9 +4.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.