H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Fernando Vicente vs Neville Godwin H2H: 0-1

Neville Godwin holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Vicente in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Neville Godwin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Neville Godwin won the 2000 Wimbledon round of 128 6-7(6) 6-1 3-6 6-2 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Vicente
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Neville Godwin
RSA Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Neville Godwin #203 6-7(6) 6-1 3-6 6-2 8-6 Fernando Vicente #31 Match data Jun 28, 2000* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Vicente #1,019 #29 993 1,762 159 213 42.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Neville Godwin #812 #90 515 1,669 34 51 40.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Vicente Neville Godwin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1992 0–1 0.0% #487 1,484 0 0
19 1996 3–3 50.0% #151 1,548 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #275 1,468 0 0
20 1997 9–12 42.9% #121 1,561 0 0 1995 2–3 40.0% #208 1,475 0 0
21 1998 20–20 50.0% #54 1,649 0 0 1996 7–6 53.8% #111 1,594 0 0
22 1999 25–29 46.3% #49 1,636 0 1 1997 7–13 35.0% #180 1,548 0 0
23 2000 24–32 42.9% #47 1,618 0 2 1998 7–7 50.0% #150 1,581 0 0
24 2001 23–26 46.9% #52 1,638 0 3 1999 1–2 33.3% #210 1,567 0 0
25 2002 23–28 45.1% #58 1,618 0 3 2000 3–4 42.9% #123 1,615 0 0
26 2003 20–29 40.8% #63 1,601 0 3 2001 5–7 41.7% #128 1,578 0 1
27 2004 4–5 44.4% #187 1,594 0 3 2002 2–7 22.2% #207 1,488 0 1
28 2005 3–5 37.5% #110 1,614 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2006 5–17 22.7% #111 1,461 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2007 0–5 0.0% #168 1,507 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2008 0–1 0.0% #206 1,482 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2009 0–1 0.0% #420 1,488 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Vicente Neville Godwin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 — — — — 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — — — — — 1995 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 19 17 36 52.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1999 4 11 15 26.7% 19 16 35 54.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 6 9 15 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 15 14 29 51.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2001 7 9 16 43.8% 16 15 31 51.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 12 13 25 48.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2003 7 12 19 36.8% 9 13 22 40.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
27 2004 — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 2002 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
28 2005 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 0 5 5 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 39 64 103 37.9% 113 128 241 46.9% 5 12 17 29.4% 2 9 11 18.2% — 17 33 50 34.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 327/372 of Fernando Vicente's and 71/85 of Neville Godwin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Vicente Neville Godwin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 1/1 1.0 3.0 50.6% 74.4% 42.1% 66.7% 16.7% 58.4% 32.0%
19 1996 4/6 1.0 2.0 70.7% 62.9% 53.7% 34.5% 38.4% 59.4% 45.4% 1994 1/1 7.0 3.0 37.0% 70.6% 53.4% 63.6% 26.7% 59.8% 44.4%
20 1997 18/21 1.1 2.7 62.5% 64.6% 47.0% 58.3% 48.0% 57.7% 45.2% 1995 4/5 3.3 5.3 59.1% 64.3% 49.1% 64.9% 36.5% 58.1% 37.3%
21 1998 32/40 2.2 2.7 61.9% 62.8% 50.4% 55.1% 44.5% 58.1% 40.8% 1996 11/13 7.4 5.5 50.8% 71.4% 46.3% 60.9% 49.9% 58.9% 35.4%
22 1999 47/54 2.3 3.2 59.8% 66.6% 48.9% 55.3% 46.2% 59.5% 42.0% 1997 15/20 5.0 4.0 55.3% 73.4% 46.6% 51.1% 42.2% 61.9% 36.4%
23 2000 44/56 3.0 3.7 59.2% 66.8% 49.6% 53.0% 41.6% 60.0% 38.9% 1998 13/14 4.8 5.1 55.4% 70.4% 43.7% 63.1% 42.4% 58.7% 36.1%
24 2001 43/49 3.7 3.6 57.7% 69.0% 47.2% 52.5% 48.3% 59.3% 39.6% 1999 3/3 4.7 6.0 51.4% 66.2% 48.4% 35.6% 53.7% 57.6% 38.2%
25 2002 44/51 3.2 1.9 57.4% 67.3% 50.1% 58.6% 46.0% 59.9% 37.2% 2000 6/7 6.2 6.3 53.3% 75.9% 47.1% 61.4% 64.2% 62.5% 34.8%
26 2003 49/49 4.6 2.6 56.4% 68.0% 48.1% 59.2% 43.5% 59.1% 34.8% 2001 10/12 3.8 5.9 54.5% 72.5% 51.0% 67.8% 51.1% 62.9% 35.0%
27 2004 9/9 2.8 1.8 58.8% 63.6% 44.2% 55.6% 42.7% 55.7% 35.8% 2002 7/9 3.6 4.9 55.7% 69.9% 39.6% 47.1% 38.2% 56.2% 38.9%
28 2005 8/8 4.4 2.3 56.9% 64.0% 51.0% 64.0% 35.5% 58.2% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 22/22 3.0 1.6 64.9% 63.7% 50.1% 53.1% 39.1% 58.8% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 5/5 1.4 1.2 70.3% 56.6% 39.1% 52.8% 24.0% 51.3% 25.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1/1 0.0 1.0 50.0% 61.8% 44.1% 50.0% 28.6% 52.9% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1/1 1.0 2.0 62.2% 30.4% 28.6% 14.3% 0.0% 29.7% 27.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 327/372 3.0 2.8 59.5% 66.1% 48.7% 55.4% 43.9% 58.9% 38.8% — 71/85 5.0 5.1 54.1% 71.4% 46.2% 58.2% 45.7% 60.0% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Vicente Neville Godwin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1484 97.9 -2.47 -0.18 0.770 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.18
19 1996 1548 120.0 +0.84 +2.51 1.118 52.2% — +29 — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.41 1994 1468 98.1 0.00 -1.69 1.105 51.2% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.24
20 1997 1562 130.5 -1.52 +3.50 1.070 51.3% — +52 — 44.4% -0.33 1–6 (14%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.43 1995 1475 102.5 -1.33 -1.24 0.891 47.8% +21 — — 40.0% -0.47 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.50
21 1998 1650 137.4 -2.98 +1.59 0.974 49.6% -108 +65 — 44.3% -0.11 10–5 (67%) 4–10 (29%) 103.1 -0.14 1996 1595 121.4 -1.47 -0.05 0.861 47.4% -44 — +97 50.0% -0.44 2–2 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 104.0 +0.40
22 1999 1637 138.5 -1.44 +2.23 1.037 50.6% -86 +109 — 45.6% -0.18 8–6 (57%) 7–12 (37%) 98.8 +0.65 1997 1549 118.2 -0.65 +0.07 0.955 49.1% +12 — +124 40.0% -0.22 2–2 (50%) 4–9 (31%) 96.8 +1.06
23 2000 1618 135.8 -1.81 +1.17 0.972 49.6% -34 +61 — 44.7% -0.20 13–15 (46%) 10–12 (45%) 100.4 -0.23 1998 1582 111.8 -2.26 -0.48 0.875 47.6% -21 — +121 42.9% -0.54 5–1 (83%) 3–2 (60%) 105.4 +1.25
24 2001 1639 132.0 -1.82 +1.08 0.972 49.5% -18 +32 — 45.5% -0.38 10–9 (53%) 12–6 (67%) 103.8 +0.90 1999 1568 102.9 -2.65 +1.66 0.900 48.3% — — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — +0.33
25 2002 1618 136.2 -2.20 -0.59 0.927 48.9% +13 +77 — 46.2% -0.27 8–8 (50%) 7–12 (37%) 96.3 0.00 2000 1616 116.4 +0.81 -0.99 0.928 48.8% -57 — +95 45.5% -0.05 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.11
26 2003 1602 129.5 -1.76 -2.08 0.852 47.4% +2 +46 -97 41.3% -0.65 9–7 (56%) 9–9 (50%) 104.2 -2.15 2001 1578 110.6 -0.58 -1.74 0.944 49.2% -112 — +212 46.9% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 4–4 (50%) 96.0 +1.24
27 2004 1594 106.7 -3.53 -0.58 0.807 45.9% — +61 — 41.7% -1.33 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 102.1 +0.13 2002 1489 103.3 -2.83 -0.17 0.890 47.4% -52 — +200 28.6% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.0 -0.29
28 2005 1614 114.5 -1.62 +0.57 0.973 49.5% — +61 — 41.7% -0.25 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.35 2003 1503 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1462 116.7 -2.31 -0.86 0.891 47.8% +46 +92 +90 32.1% -1.21 0–8 (0%) 2–4 (33%) 90.0 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1508 103.6 -3.76 -5.30 0.523 39.6% — 0 — 7.7% -3.62 0–1 1–0 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1483 99.3 -2.70 -2.66 0.907 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1488 93.1 -1.57 -0.72 0.395 28.8% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1471 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1763 134.5 -1.98 +0.46 0.943 49.0% -22 +64 -35 43.1% -0.44 63–68 (48%) 62–72 (46%) 98.5 -0.12 — 1670 117.3 -1.29 -0.45 0.907 48.2% -27 — +148 42.0% -0.43 17–15 (53%) 19–23 (45%) 100.0 +5.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.