H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Fernando Vicente vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 1-1

Fernando Vicente and Paul Haarhuis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fernando Vicente leads 1–0 on clay, while Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Paul Haarhuis won the 1999 Wimbledon round of 64 6-2 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Vicente
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Paul Haarhuis
NED Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Haarhuis #93 6-2 6-2 6-2 Fernando Vicente #46 Match data Jun 25, 1999* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Fernando Vicente #117 6-3 7-6(3) Paul Haarhuis #79 Match data Jul 31, 1997* R32 Dutch Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Vicente #1,019 #29 993 1,762 159 213 42.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Paul Haarhuis #623 #18 1,341 1,887 251 247 50.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Vicente Paul Haarhuis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1996 3–3 50.0% #151 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1997 9–12 42.9% #121 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1998 20–20 50.0% #54 1,649 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1999 25–29 46.3% #49 1,636 0 1 1988 0–1 0.0% #462 1,488 0 0
23 2000 24–32 42.9% #47 1,618 0 2 1989 9–7 56.2% #57 1,635 0 0
24 2001 23–26 46.9% #52 1,638 0 3 1990 20–25 44.4% #54 1,670 0 0
25 2002 23–28 45.1% #58 1,618 0 3 1991 25–25 50.0% #37 1,729 0 0
26 2003 20–29 40.8% #63 1,601 0 3 1992 33–29 53.2% #39 1,684 0 0
27 2004 4–5 44.4% #187 1,594 0 3 1993 30–26 53.6% #42 1,764 0 0
28 2005 3–5 37.5% #110 1,614 0 3 1994 26–22 54.2% #37 1,715 0 0
29 2006 5–17 22.7% #111 1,461 0 3 1995 33–24 57.9% #19 1,715 0 1
30 2007 0–5 0.0% #168 1,507 0 3 1996 30–28 51.7% #25 1,735 0 1
31 2008 0–1 0.0% #206 1,482 0 3 1997 19–25 43.2% #70 1,674 0 1
32 2009 0–1 0.0% #420 1,488 0 3 1998 20–20 50.0% #74 1,660 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1999 6–15 28.6% #178 1,620 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Vicente Paul Haarhuis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1996 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 — — — — 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 19 17 36 52.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 4 11 15 26.7% 19 16 35 54.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 15 14 29 51.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2001 7 9 16 43.8% 16 15 31 51.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
25 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 12 13 25 48.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 14 11 25 56.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2003 7 12 19 36.8% 9 13 22 40.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 20 12 32 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
27 2004 — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 1993 12 10 22 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 2005 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
29 2006 0 5 5 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1995 13 8 21 61.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
30 2007 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 13 13 26 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
31 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 7 11 18 38.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5%
32 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 6 10 40.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 39 64 103 37.9% 113 128 241 46.9% 5 12 17 29.4% 2 9 11 18.2% — 111 98 209 53.1% 56 70 126 44.4% 28 25 53 52.8% 56 54 110 50.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 327/372 of Fernando Vicente's and 380/436 of Paul Haarhuis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Vicente Paul Haarhuis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1996 4/6 1.0 2.0 70.7% 62.9% 53.7% 34.5% 38.4% 59.4% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 18/21 1.1 2.7 62.5% 64.6% 47.0% 58.3% 48.0% 57.7% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 32/40 2.2 2.7 61.9% 62.8% 50.4% 55.1% 44.5% 58.1% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 47/54 2.3 3.2 59.8% 66.6% 48.9% 55.3% 46.2% 59.5% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 44/56 3.0 3.7 59.2% 66.8% 49.6% 53.0% 41.6% 60.0% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 43/49 3.7 3.6 57.7% 69.0% 47.2% 52.5% 48.3% 59.3% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 44/51 3.2 1.9 57.4% 67.3% 50.1% 58.6% 46.0% 59.9% 37.2% 1991 44/50 3.8 2.3 58.4% 68.3% 52.1% 45.9% 48.3% 61.5% 40.2%
26 2003 49/49 4.6 2.6 56.4% 68.0% 48.1% 59.2% 43.5% 59.1% 34.8% 1992 55/62 4.0 1.9 59.8% 70.2% 51.8% 63.1% 41.7% 62.7% 38.0%
27 2004 9/9 2.8 1.8 58.8% 63.6% 44.2% 55.6% 42.7% 55.7% 35.8% 1993 51/56 4.0 2.0 59.5% 69.2% 52.2% 60.9% 43.4% 62.2% 38.2%
28 2005 8/8 4.4 2.3 56.9% 64.0% 51.0% 64.0% 35.5% 58.2% 40.7% 1994 43/48 4.2 2.0 59.7% 68.8% 50.0% 64.0% 48.8% 61.1% 37.1%
29 2006 22/22 3.0 1.6 64.9% 63.7% 50.1% 53.1% 39.1% 58.8% 36.7% 1995 55/57 4.6 2.6 59.8% 68.3% 50.7% 54.3% 40.4% 61.0% 36.3%
30 2007 5/5 1.4 1.2 70.3% 56.6% 39.1% 52.8% 24.0% 51.3% 25.5% 1996 48/58 4.2 1.8 62.5% 68.2% 51.8% 50.8% 44.9% 62.2% 35.8%
31 2008 1/1 0.0 1.0 50.0% 61.8% 44.1% 50.0% 28.6% 52.9% 42.7% 1997 37/44 5.3 2.8 59.7% 71.9% 51.2% 59.4% 46.1% 63.5% 37.4%
32 2009 1/1 1.0 2.0 62.2% 30.4% 28.6% 14.3% 0.0% 29.7% 27.8% 1998 30/40 5.8 3.2 56.4% 71.4% 50.5% 60.7% 45.0% 62.5% 36.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 17/21 5.3 2.4 61.5% 68.9% 48.6% 61.8% 29.9% 61.0% 36.2%
Career — 327/372 3.0 2.8 59.5% 66.1% 48.7% 55.4% 43.9% 58.9% 38.8% — 380/498 4.4 2.3 59.7% 69.4% 51.2% 57.5% 43.9% 62.0% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Vicente Paul Haarhuis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1996 1548 120.0 +0.84 +2.51 1.118 52.2% — +29 — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1562 130.5 -1.52 +3.50 1.070 51.3% — +52 — 44.4% -0.33 1–6 (14%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 1650 137.4 -2.98 +1.59 0.974 49.6% -108 +65 — 44.3% -0.11 10–5 (67%) 4–10 (29%) 103.1 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 1637 138.5 -1.44 +2.23 1.037 50.6% -86 +109 — 45.6% -0.18 8–6 (57%) 7–12 (37%) 98.8 +0.65 1988 1489 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04
23 2000 1618 135.8 -1.81 +1.17 0.972 49.6% -34 +61 — 44.7% -0.20 13–15 (46%) 10–12 (45%) 100.4 -0.23 1989 1636 132.2 — — — — -19 -43 — 54.3% +0.30 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) 101.8 +0.52
24 2001 1639 132.0 -1.82 +1.08 0.972 49.5% -18 +32 — 45.5% -0.38 10–9 (53%) 12–6 (67%) 103.8 +0.90 1990 1670 140.9 — — — — -4 -37 -64 46.9% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) 100.3 -1.33
25 2002 1618 136.2 -2.20 -0.59 0.927 48.9% +13 +77 — 46.2% -0.27 8–8 (50%) 7–12 (37%) 96.3 0.00 1991 1730 144.8 +0.85 +1.66 1.042 50.8% +15 -61 -171 51.1% +0.31 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) 102.5 -2.69
26 2003 1602 129.5 -1.76 -2.08 0.852 47.4% +2 +46 -97 41.3% -0.65 9–7 (56%) 9–9 (50%) 104.2 -2.16 1992 1685 143.9 +1.01 +0.37 1.019 50.2% +33 -24 — 50.3% +0.07 9–8 (53%) 12–15 (44%) 99.9 -0.46
27 2004 1594 106.7 -3.53 -0.58 0.807 45.9% — +61 — 41.7% -1.33 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 102.1 +0.13 1993 1764 141.2 +1.06 +0.08 1.010 50.5% -19 +4 -232 53.5% +0.17 8–9 (47%) 11–11 (50%) 102.1 -0.40
28 2005 1614 114.5 -1.62 +0.57 0.973 49.5% — +61 — 41.7% -0.25 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.35 1994 1715 147.9 +0.13 -0.29 0.953 49.4% +46 +62 — 50.8% -0.08 10–4 (71%) 8–9 (47%) 104.6 -1.32
29 2006 1462 116.7 -2.31 -0.86 0.891 47.8% +46 +92 +90 32.1% -1.21 0–8 (0%) 2–4 (33%) 90.0 +0.66 1995 1716 137.5 -0.59 -0.36 0.931 48.7% +46 -19 -93 50.0% -0.17 18–5 (78%) 11–12 (48%) 106.7 +0.15
30 2007 1508 103.6 -3.76 -5.30 0.523 39.6% — 0 — 7.7% -3.62 0–1 1–0 — 0.00 1996 1736 139.0 +0.20 -0.84 0.946 49.0% +10 -47 -15 46.6% -0.19 12–5 (71%) 13–16 (45%) 105.2 +0.88
31 2008 1483 99.3 -2.70 -2.66 0.907 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.18 1997 1675 138.9 +1.41 -0.41 1.025 50.4% -16 -7 +99 48.7% +0.13 5–13 (28%) 14–12 (54%) 93.4 -0.68
32 2009 1488 93.1 -1.57 -0.72 0.395 28.8% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.06 1998 1660 132.7 +0.38 -1.61 0.960 49.6% +19 -37 +79 48.4% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–7 (46%) 103.3 +1.10
33 2010 1471 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1620 127.7 -0.68 -0.73 0.928 48.6% +35 -73 +103 42.4% -0.44 0–6 (0%) 2–7 (22%) 89.4 -1.04
Career — 1763 134.5 -1.98 +0.46 0.943 49.0% -22 +64 -35 43.1% -0.44 63–68 (48%) 62–72 (46%) 98.5 -0.12 — 1888 146.0 +0.48 -0.13 0.982 49.8% +17 -22 -15 49.4% 0.00 84–71 (54%) 97–108 (47%) 102.8 -1.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.