H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Fernando Vicente vs Rajeev Ram

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Fernando Vicente vs Rajeev Ram.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Vicente
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Vicente #165 6-7(6) 6-2 10-8 Rajeev Ram #175 Match data Jun 25, 2007 Q1 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Vicente #1,019 #29 993 1,762 159 213 42.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Vicente Rajeev Ram
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
19 1996 3–3 50.0% #151 1,548 0 0 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0
20 1997 9–12 42.9% #121 1,561 0 0 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0
21 1998 20–20 50.0% #54 1,649 0 0 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0
22 1999 25–29 46.3% #49 1,636 0 1 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0
23 2000 24–32 42.9% #47 1,618 0 2 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0
24 2001 23–26 46.9% #52 1,638 0 3 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,478 0 0
25 2002 23–28 45.1% #58 1,618 0 3 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1
26 2003 20–29 40.8% #63 1,601 0 3 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1
27 2004 4–5 44.4% #187 1,594 0 3 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1
28 2005 3–5 37.5% #110 1,614 0 3 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1
29 2006 5–17 22.7% #111 1,461 0 3 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1
30 2007 0–5 0.0% #168 1,507 0 3 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1
31 2008 0–1 0.0% #206 1,482 0 3 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2
32 2009 0–1 0.0% #420 1,488 0 3 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Vicente Rajeev Ram
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 — — — — 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 19 17 36 52.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 4 11 15 26.7% 19 16 35 54.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 15 14 29 51.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 7 9 16 43.8% 16 15 31 51.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 12 13 25 48.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
26 2003 7 12 19 36.8% 9 13 22 40.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2004 — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
29 2006 0 5 5 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 2007 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — —
32 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 39 64 103 37.9% 113 128 241 46.9% 5 12 17 29.4% 2 9 11 18.2% — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 327/372 of Fernando Vicente's and 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Vicente Rajeev Ram
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6%
19 1996 4/6 1.0 2.0 70.7% 62.9% 53.7% 34.5% 38.4% 59.4% 45.4% 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8%
20 1997 18/21 1.1 2.7 62.5% 64.6% 47.0% 58.3% 48.0% 57.7% 45.2% 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2%
21 1998 32/40 2.2 2.7 61.9% 62.8% 50.4% 55.1% 44.5% 58.1% 40.8% 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7%
22 1999 47/54 2.3 3.2 59.8% 66.6% 48.9% 55.3% 46.2% 59.5% 42.0% 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5%
23 2000 44/56 3.0 3.7 59.2% 66.8% 49.6% 53.0% 41.6% 60.0% 38.9% 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8%
24 2001 43/49 3.7 3.6 57.7% 69.0% 47.2% 52.5% 48.3% 59.3% 39.6% 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5%
25 2002 44/51 3.2 1.9 57.4% 67.3% 50.1% 58.6% 46.0% 59.9% 37.2% 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0%
26 2003 49/49 4.6 2.6 56.4% 68.0% 48.1% 59.2% 43.5% 59.1% 34.8% 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1%
27 2004 9/9 2.8 1.8 58.8% 63.6% 44.2% 55.6% 42.7% 55.7% 35.8% 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3%
28 2005 8/8 4.4 2.3 56.9% 64.0% 51.0% 64.0% 35.5% 58.2% 40.7% 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3%
29 2006 22/22 3.0 1.6 64.9% 63.7% 50.1% 53.1% 39.1% 58.8% 36.7% 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6%
30 2007 5/5 1.4 1.2 70.3% 56.6% 39.1% 52.8% 24.0% 51.3% 25.5% 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9%
31 2008 1/1 0.0 1.0 50.0% 61.8% 44.1% 50.0% 28.6% 52.9% 42.7% 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1%
32 2009 1/1 1.0 2.0 62.2% 30.4% 28.6% 14.3% 0.0% 29.7% 27.8% 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7%
Career — 327/372 3.0 2.8 59.5% 66.1% 48.7% 55.4% 43.9% 58.9% 38.8% — 150/151 7.6 2.9 60.2% 72.8% 48.6% 57.4% 38.6% 63.1% 32.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Vicente Rajeev Ram
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
19 1996 1548 120.0 +0.84 +2.51 1.118 52.2% — +29 — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.41 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.02
20 1997 1562 130.5 -1.52 +3.50 1.070 51.3% — +52 — 44.4% -0.33 1–6 (14%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.43 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.23
21 1998 1650 137.4 -2.98 +1.59 0.974 49.6% -108 +65 — 44.3% -0.11 10–5 (67%) 4–10 (29%) 103.1 -0.14 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.22
22 1999 1637 138.5 -1.44 +2.23 1.037 50.6% -86 +109 — 45.6% -0.18 8–6 (57%) 7–12 (37%) 98.8 +0.65 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05
23 2000 1618 135.8 -1.81 +1.17 0.972 49.6% -34 +61 — 44.7% -0.20 13–15 (46%) 10–12 (45%) 100.4 -0.23 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10
24 2001 1639 132.0 -1.82 +1.08 0.972 49.5% -18 +32 — 45.5% -0.38 10–9 (53%) 12–6 (67%) 103.8 +0.90 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.19
25 2002 1618 136.2 -2.20 -0.59 0.927 48.9% +13 +77 — 46.2% -0.27 8–8 (50%) 7–12 (37%) 96.3 0.00 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +148 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 99.9 +0.97
26 2003 1602 129.5 -1.76 -2.08 0.852 47.4% +2 +46 -97 41.3% -0.65 9–7 (56%) 9–9 (50%) 104.2 -2.16 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +0.56
27 2004 1594 106.7 -3.53 -0.58 0.807 45.9% — +61 — 41.7% -1.33 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 102.1 +0.13 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
28 2005 1614 114.5 -1.62 +0.57 0.973 49.5% — +61 — 41.7% -0.25 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.35 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) — +1.50
29 2006 1462 116.7 -2.31 -0.86 0.891 47.8% +46 +92 +90 32.1% -1.21 0–8 (0%) 2–4 (33%) 90.0 +0.66 2013 1647 124.3 -1.42 -2.56 0.856 47.5% -6 — +7 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 94.5 +0.29
30 2007 1508 103.6 -3.76 -5.30 0.523 39.6% — 0 — 7.7% -3.62 0–1 1–0 — 0.00 2014 1661 116.5 -1.88 -1.96 0.844 47.1% 0 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +0.65
31 2008 1483 99.3 -2.70 -2.66 0.907 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.18 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) 104.7 +0.64
32 2009 1488 93.1 -1.57 -0.72 0.395 28.8% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.06 2016 1617 133.1 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +29 -87 +110 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) 105.8 +0.66
33 2010 1471 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -27 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 — +0.44
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1763 134.5 -1.98 +0.46 0.943 49.0% -22 +64 -35 43.1% -0.44 63–68 (48%) 62–72 (46%) 98.5 -0.12 — 1748 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -67 +107 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) 104.5 +4.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.