H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Fernando Vicente vs Renzo Furlan H2H: 2-0
Fernando Vicente holds a 2–0 lead over Renzo Furlan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fernando Vicente leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Vicente won the 1998 Prague fourth round 3-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1998* | Prague | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Vicente | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
| Jul 16, 1997* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Fernando Vicente | 6-3 6-4 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Renzo Furlan | #1,479 | #19 | 1,235 | 1,844 | 209 | 231 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Vicente | Renzo Furlan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #222 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #77 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 37–31 | 54.4% | #29 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #40 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,514 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #225 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #236 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,540 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #194 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |