H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Fernando Vicente vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 0-1
Viktor Troicki holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Vicente in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Viktor Troicki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2006 Tokyo second round 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2006* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Viktor Troicki | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | Fernando Vicente | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Viktor Troicki | #1,433 | #12 | 2,015 | 2,008 | 268 | 256 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Vicente | Viktor Troicki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #75 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #101 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #22 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #205 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #232 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |