H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Filip Dewulf vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-2

Cedric Pioline holds a 2–1 lead over Filip Dewulf in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on carpet, while Filip Dewulf leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1997 Grand Slam Cup round of 16 7-6 2-2 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Filip Dewulf
BEL Age 54 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cedric Pioline #23 7-6 2-2 (ret.) Filip Dewulf #39 Match data Sep 27, 1997* R16 Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals Carpet
Filip Dewulf #112 7-6(8) 6-4 Cedric Pioline #27 Match data Feb 21, 1997* R16 Antwerp Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Cedric Pioline #62 6-4 3-6 7-5 Filip Dewulf #69 Match data Feb 3, 1996* QF Geneva Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Filip Dewulf #1,378 #39 975 1,801 85 109 43.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Filip Dewulf Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0
21 1993 5–6 45.5% #168 1,534 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1994 4–9 30.8% #134 1,513 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1995 14–12 53.8% #65 1,690 0 1 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0
24 1996 19–32 37.3% #96 1,562 0 1 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1997 19–23 45.2% #41 1,593 0 2 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0
26 1998 22–21 51.2% #55 1,731 0 2 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0
27 1999 1–3 25.0% #326 1,706 0 2 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1
28 2000 1–3 25.0% #161 1,669 0 2 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Filip Dewulf Cedric Pioline
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5%
24 1996 5 11 16 31.3% 5 12 17 29.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 1997 5 8 13 38.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 1998 4 8 12 33.3% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
28 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 23 42 65 35.4% 41 42 83 49.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 18 18 36 50.0% — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 161/194 of Filip Dewulf's and 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Filip Dewulf Cedric Pioline
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1993 9/11 1.3 2.3 63.2% 63.3% 48.8% 64.4% 44.2% 58.0% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 8/13 2.0 4.1 56.8% 62.6% 38.7% 48.7% 27.2% 52.3% 31.5% 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4%
23 1995 26/26 4.3 3.6 56.7% 70.4% 48.4% 59.5% 43.6% 60.7% 37.3% 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9%
24 1996 46/51 4.5 5.3 51.0% 74.1% 47.0% 52.9% 52.6% 60.8% 37.8% 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4%
25 1997 30/42 4.5 5.6 53.6% 71.6% 51.2% 64.2% 46.0% 62.2% 37.9% 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9%
26 1998 35/43 3.7 4.5 55.7% 73.6% 48.3% 55.4% 49.6% 62.3% 35.9% 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6%
27 1999 3/4 1.7 4.0 63.6% 63.7% 41.8% 56.6% 23.6% 55.8% 36.4% 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6%
28 2000 4/4 3.3 2.3 65.1% 65.4% 52.5% 38.1% 28.5% 60.0% 34.0% 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6%
Career — 161/194 3.9 4.6 55.0% 71.3% 48.0% 56.8% 46.4% 60.7% 37.0% — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Filip Dewulf Cedric Pioline
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41
21 1993 1535 120.1 -1.14 -0.09 0.925 48.9% — +42 — 44.4% -0.37 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.10
22 1994 1513 111.0 -3.41 -4.51 0.660 42.3% +33 +14 — 33.3% -0.97 1–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.42 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.32
23 1995 1691 127.6 +0.34 -1.24 0.950 49.4% -29 -91 — 50.0% -0.28 5–2 (71%) 9–3 (75%) — +0.57 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) — -1.91
24 1996 1563 129.2 -0.52 -0.46 0.964 49.3% +41 -35 — 41.9% -0.39 6–11 (35%) 1–11 (8%) — -0.82 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) — -4.16
25 1997 1593 133.0 -0.01 +0.39 1.002 50.1% -62 +152 — 50.0% +0.10 4–10 (29%) 5–14 (26%) — +1.07 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.27
26 1998 1732 136.8 +0.67 -1.93 0.952 49.1% -183 +143 -168 51.9% -0.02 5–6 (45%) 13–4 (76%) — -1.48 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) — -3.16
27 1999 1707 107.4 +0.40 -0.59 0.824 46.8% -155 — — 33.3% -1.55 0–1 0–1 — -0.45 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.10
28 2000 1669 116.4 -1.78 -0.40 0.849 47.2% -115 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–1 0–1 — -0.47 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.00
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) — -0.97
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) — -2.23
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.89
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.75
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) — -2.76
Career — 1801 134.4 -0.22 -0.93 0.940 48.9% -41 +61 -168 46.2% -0.26 25–34 (42%) 30–42 (42%) 95.8 -0.45 — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.