H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Filip Dewulf vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-2
Cedric Pioline holds a 2–1 lead over Filip Dewulf in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on carpet, while Filip Dewulf leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1997 Grand Slam Cup fourth round 7-6 2-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 54
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 1997* | Grand Slam Cup | ATP Finals | R16 | Carpet | Cedric Pioline | 7-6 2-2 (ret.) | Filip Dewulf | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1997* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Filip Dewulf | 7-6(8) 6-4 | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
| Feb 3, 1996* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Cedric Pioline | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Filip Dewulf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filip Dewulf | #1,378 | #39 | 975 | 1,800 | 85 | 109 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Filip Dewulf | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #168 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #134 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 19–32 | 37.3% | #96 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #41 | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #326 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 |