Filip Dewulf
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goran Ivanisevic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 17, 2000 | H2H |
| Albert Costa | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 1, 1998 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 31, 1998 | H2H |
| Alex Corretja | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 11, 1998 | H2H |
| Johan Van Herck | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 18, 1998 | — |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC
Guillaume Raoux holds a 2–0 lead over Filip Dewulf in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Guillaume Raoux leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillaume Raoux won the 1997 Paris Masters round of 64 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillaume Raoux | 7-5 6-3 | Filip Dewulf | Match data | Oct 29, 1997* | R64 | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | Carpet |
| Guillaume Raoux | 7-6(5) 3-6 1-6 6-3 7-5 | Filip Dewulf | Match data | Aug 28, 1996* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filip Dewulf | #1,378 | #39 | 975 | 1,801 | 85 | 109 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,808 | 175 | 223 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Filip Dewulf | Guillaume Raoux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #168 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #134 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 19–32 | 37.3% | #96 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #41 | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #72 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #326 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Filip Dewulf | Guillaume Raoux | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 21 | 1993 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% |
| 22 | 1994 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1992 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 23 | 1995 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% | 1993 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1996 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 1994 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 25 | 1997 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 1995 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 1998 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1996 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% |
| 27 | 1999 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 28 | 2000 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 55.2% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 23 | 42 | 65 | 35.4% | 41 | 42 | 83 | 49.4% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 18 | 18 | 36 | 50.0% | — | 94 | 112 | 206 | 45.6% | 14 | 36 | 50 | 28.0% | 21 | 27 | 48 | 43.8% | 46 | 48 | 94 | 48.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 161/194 of Filip Dewulf's and 339/375 of Guillaume Raoux's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Filip Dewulf | Guillaume Raoux | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 21 | 1993 | 9/11 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 63.2% | 63.3% | 48.8% | 64.4% | 44.2% | 58.0% | 38.8% | 1991 | 37/39 | 5.7 | 3.5 | 51.1% | 72.6% | 48.3% | 53.7% | 42.7% | 60.7% | 36.1% |
| 22 | 1994 | 8/13 | 2.0 | 4.1 | 56.8% | 62.6% | 38.7% | 48.7% | 27.2% | 52.3% | 31.5% | 1992 | 28/30 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 52.5% | 71.6% | 50.9% | 61.6% | 49.3% | 61.8% | 37.9% |
| 23 | 1995 | 26/26 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 56.7% | 70.4% | 48.4% | 59.5% | 43.6% | 60.7% | 37.3% | 1993 | 48/55 | 4.8 | 2.9 | 51.0% | 74.0% | 52.3% | 58.5% | 44.4% | 63.1% | 39.3% |
| 24 | 1996 | 46/51 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 51.0% | 74.1% | 47.0% | 52.9% | 52.6% | 60.8% | 37.8% | 1994 | 34/35 | 4.2 | 3.2 | 52.9% | 72.1% | 48.9% | 54.2% | 36.7% | 61.2% | 36.4% |
| 25 | 1997 | 30/42 | 4.5 | 5.6 | 53.6% | 71.6% | 51.2% | 64.2% | 46.0% | 62.2% | 37.9% | 1995 | 38/39 | 5.1 | 2.9 | 50.3% | 72.5% | 50.6% | 58.8% | 45.0% | 61.8% | 35.5% |
| 26 | 1998 | 35/43 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 55.7% | 73.6% | 48.3% | 55.4% | 49.6% | 62.3% | 35.9% | 1996 | 36/43 | 6.3 | 2.9 | 51.8% | 75.4% | 53.5% | 59.8% | 46.9% | 65.0% | 35.4% |
| 27 | 1999 | 3/4 | 1.7 | 4.0 | 63.6% | 63.7% | 41.8% | 56.6% | 23.6% | 55.8% | 36.4% | 1997 | 45/52 | 5.2 | 2.7 | 55.6% | 74.8% | 53.4% | 55.0% | 38.6% | 65.6% | 35.4% |
| 28 | 2000 | 4/4 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 65.1% | 65.4% | 52.5% | 38.1% | 28.5% | 60.0% | 34.0% | 1998 | 45/51 | 3.7 | 2.4 | 55.7% | 70.5% | 53.7% | 63.3% | 39.9% | 63.2% | 33.6% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 26/29 | 4.9 | 3.7 | 50.3% | 70.5% | 53.1% | 61.5% | 36.8% | 61.8% | 32.0% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2/2 | 5.5 | 2.5 | 51.7% | 70.6% | 55.9% | 75.0% | 21.6% | 63.6% | 35.1% |
| Career | — | 161/194 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 55.0% | 71.3% | 48.0% | 56.8% | 46.4% | 60.7% | 37.0% | — | 339/398 | 4.9 | 3.0 | 52.5% | 72.8% | 51.8% | 58.5% | 42.1% | 62.9% | 35.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Filip Dewulf | Guillaume Raoux | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1493 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.67 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.12 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1463 | 110.5 | — | — | — | — | +66 | — | — | 22.2% | -1.61 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.21 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1530 | 117.3 | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | +38 | 45.0% | -0.22 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 98.6 | +0.60 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1535 | 120.1 | -1.14 | -0.09 | 0.925 | 48.9% | — | +42 | — | 44.4% | -0.37 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.29 | 1991 | 1617 | 126.4 | +0.36 | -2.95 | 0.919 | 48.7% | -14 | — | -57 | 38.5% | -0.57 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–8 (33%) | 100.3 | -0.55 |
| 22 | 1994 | 1513 | 111.0 | -3.41 | -4.51 | 0.660 | 42.3% | +33 | +14 | — | 33.3% | -0.97 | 1–1 | 0–6 (0%) | — | +0.42 | 1992 | 1620 | 126.0 | -0.28 | +0.33 | 0.993 | 50.1% | 0 | — | -46 | 48.6% | +0.11 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–8 (11%) | 91.6 | +1.27 |
| 23 | 1995 | 1691 | 127.6 | +0.34 | -1.24 | 0.950 | 49.4% | -29 | -91 | — | 50.0% | -0.28 | 5–2 (71%) | 9–3 (75%) | 109.4 | +0.57 | 1993 | 1628 | 138.5 | +1.31 | +1.04 | 1.066 | 51.2% | +27 | -183 | -16 | 51.8% | +0.17 | 5–13 (28%) | 7–7 (50%) | 95.9 | -0.69 |
| 24 | 1996 | 1563 | 129.2 | -0.52 | -0.46 | 0.964 | 49.3% | +41 | -35 | — | 41.9% | -0.39 | 6–11 (35%) | 1–11 (8%) | 90.7 | -0.82 | 1994 | 1573 | 130.1 | -0.73 | -1.57 | 0.936 | 48.9% | +66 | -127 | +7 | 43.7% | -0.43 | 4–4 (50%) | 9–9 (50%) | 102.8 | +0.24 |
| 25 | 1997 | 1593 | 133.0 | -0.01 | +0.39 | 1.002 | 50.1% | -62 | +152 | — | 50.0% | +0.10 | 4–10 (29%) | 5–14 (26%) | 89.9 | +1.07 | 1995 | 1567 | 120.6 | -0.21 | -2.56 | 0.930 | 48.9% | +49 | -88 | -28 | 44.2% | -0.47 | 7–6 (54%) | 9–7 (56%) | 103.6 | +1.91 |
| 26 | 1998 | 1732 | 136.8 | +0.67 | -1.93 | 0.952 | 49.1% | -183 | +143 | -168 | 51.9% | -0.02 | 5–6 (45%) | 13–4 (76%) | 106.5 | -1.48 | 1996 | 1621 | 132.1 | +2.42 | -1.48 | 1.013 | 50.4% | +23 | -150 | -47 | 50.0% | +0.10 | 6–8 (43%) | 14–11 (56%) | 104.5 | -0.30 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1707 | 107.4 | +0.40 | -0.59 | 0.824 | 46.8% | -155 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.55 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.45 | 1997 | 1729 | 142.3 | +2.81 | -1.42 | 1.030 | 50.7% | -9 | -216 | -38 | 54.5% | +0.22 | 4–7 (36%) | 17–8 (68%) | 106.2 | -0.78 |
| 28 | 2000 | 1669 | 116.4 | -1.78 | -0.40 | 0.849 | 47.2% | -115 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.30 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.47 | 1998 | 1736 | 144.0 | +1.79 | -2.65 | 0.911 | 48.6% | +35 | -207 | -109 | 50.4% | -0.25 | 7–10 (41%) | 23–9 (72%) | 104.5 | -2.53 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1578 | 127.4 | +0.36 | -4.10 | 0.838 | 47.6% | +71 | — | — | 38.9% | -0.83 | 2–5 (29%) | 7–7 (50%) | 93.4 | +0.04 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1554 | 113.4 | -1.28 | -1.62 | 0.966 | 48.4% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.02 |
| Career | — | 1801 | 134.4 | -0.22 | -0.93 | 0.940 | 48.9% | -41 | +61 | -168 | 46.2% | -0.26 | 25–34 (42%) | 30–42 (42%) | 95.8 | -0.45 | — | 1808 | 138.0 | +0.99 | -1.61 | 0.965 | 49.6% | +27 | -165 | -34 | 46.7% | -0.22 | 45–72 (38%) | 92–82 (53%) | 100.7 | -0.28 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goran Ivanisevic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 17, 2000 | H2H |
| Albert Costa | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 1, 1998 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 31, 1998 | H2H |
| Alex Corretja | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 11, 1998 | H2H |
| Johan Van Herck | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 18, 1998 | — |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Woodbridge | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 29, 1998 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 30, 1999 | H2H |
| Karol Kucera | 0 | 6 | 6 | Feb 26, 1999 | H2H |
| David Prinosil | 2 | 4 | 6 | Feb 13, 1999 | H2H |
| Kenneth Carlsen | 6 | 0 | 6 | Jul 31, 1998 | H2H |