H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Filip Dewulf vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 2-0
Filip Dewulf holds a 2–0 lead over Nicklas Kulti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Filip Dewulf leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Filip Dewulf won the 1998 Copenhagen third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 54
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1998* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Filip Dewulf | 6-4 6-4 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
| Apr 7, 1993* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Filip Dewulf | 6-3 6-2 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filip Dewulf | #1,378 | #39 | 975 | 1,800 | 85 | 109 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Filip Dewulf | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #168 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #134 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 19–32 | 37.3% | #96 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #41 | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #326 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |