H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Filip Dewulf vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 1-0

Filip Dewulf holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Filip Dewulf leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Filip Dewulf won the 1998 Swiss Open Gstaad quarterfinal 1-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Filip Dewulf
BEL Age 54 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Filip Dewulf #53 1-6 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Kiefer #28 Match data Jul 11, 1998* QF Swiss Open Gstaad ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Filip Dewulf #1,378 #39 975 1,801 85 109 43.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,995 347 255 57.6% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Filip Dewulf Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,563 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,799 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,792 0 1
21 1993 5–6 45.5% #168 1,534 0 0 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,922 0 4
22 1994 4–9 30.8% #134 1,513 0 0 2000 30–16 65.2% #20 1,900 0 6
23 1995 14–12 53.8% #65 1,690 0 1 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,763 0 6
24 1996 19–32 37.3% #96 1,562 0 1 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,717 0 6
25 1997 19–23 45.2% #41 1,593 0 2 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 1998 22–21 51.2% #55 1,731 0 2 2004 34–20 63.0% #21 1,886 0 6
27 1999 1–3 25.0% #326 1,706 0 2 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,862 0 6
28 2000 1–3 25.0% #161 1,669 0 2 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,863 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,906 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2008 22–17 56.4% #38 1,889 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,762 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,722 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Filip Dewulf Nicolas Kiefer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 7 5 12 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 11 5 16 68.8%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 24 15 39 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 1999 41 15 56 73.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1996 5 11 16 31.3% 5 12 17 29.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2002 10 15 25 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1997 5 8 13 38.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2003 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 1998 4 8 12 33.3% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2004 30 14 44 68.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 15 13 28 53.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
28 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 17 9 26 65.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 12 11 23 52.2% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 4 7 11 36.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
Career — 23 42 65 35.4% 41 42 83 49.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 18 18 36 50.0% — 221 145 366 60.4% 47 55 102 46.1% 44 30 74 59.5% 35 25 60 58.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 161/194 of Filip Dewulf's and 537/601 of Nicolas Kiefer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Filip Dewulf Nicolas Kiefer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 6/6 4.7 2.3 61.5% 72.6% 51.3% 62.7% 44.1% 64.8% 36.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 11/16 6.1 2.5 52.2% 76.6% 47.8% 53.2% 49.7% 62.7% 39.8%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 37/42 7.9 3.5 55.2% 77.0% 48.3% 60.5% 52.5% 64.1% 36.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 49/56 6.2 4.7 53.7% 74.8% 47.8% 55.1% 44.4% 62.5% 39.0%
21 1993 9/11 1.3 2.3 63.2% 63.3% 48.8% 64.4% 44.2% 58.0% 38.8% 1999 56/74 6.6 4.3 51.5% 75.7% 53.2% 61.8% 43.5% 64.7% 40.4%
22 1994 8/13 2.0 4.1 56.8% 62.6% 38.7% 48.7% 27.2% 52.3% 31.5% 2000 38/46 6.4 4.3 52.7% 74.9% 52.3% 61.7% 48.3% 64.3% 40.1%
23 1995 26/26 4.3 3.6 56.7% 70.4% 48.4% 59.5% 43.6% 60.7% 37.3% 2001 44/51 6.3 4.1 50.3% 71.1% 48.8% 54.0% 50.7% 60.0% 40.0%
24 1996 46/51 4.5 5.3 51.0% 74.1% 47.0% 52.9% 52.6% 60.8% 37.8% 2002 40/43 6.2 4.5 52.6% 74.1% 47.8% 58.8% 50.7% 61.5% 37.6%
25 1997 30/42 4.5 5.6 53.6% 71.6% 51.2% 64.2% 46.0% 62.2% 37.9% 2003 36/36 6.5 3.8 50.8% 73.1% 49.9% 58.1% 44.7% 61.8% 37.4%
26 1998 35/43 3.7 4.5 55.7% 73.6% 48.3% 55.4% 49.6% 62.3% 35.9% 2004 51/54 7.3 3.8 54.9% 77.8% 48.4% 61.1% 41.4% 64.5% 38.7%
27 1999 3/4 1.7 4.0 63.6% 63.7% 41.8% 56.6% 23.6% 55.8% 36.4% 2005 52/53 7.6 3.8 53.4% 74.2% 51.4% 56.4% 51.3% 63.6% 40.9%
28 2000 4/4 3.3 2.3 65.1% 65.4% 52.5% 38.1% 28.5% 60.0% 34.0% 2006 21/22 7.4 4.0 51.7% 72.0% 50.1% 59.5% 43.3% 61.3% 40.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 30/31 6.7 2.5 57.0% 79.9% 51.6% 64.6% 33.9% 67.8% 38.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/39 7.2 2.4 53.6% 76.3% 51.9% 55.4% 44.9% 64.9% 39.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 28/28 7.7 3.9 52.0% 75.0% 47.3% 62.9% 45.8% 61.9% 35.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 4/4 11.3 6.5 51.8% 77.7% 47.3% 55.7% 31.0% 63.0% 28.6%
Career — 161/194 3.9 4.6 55.0% 71.3% 48.0% 56.8% 46.4% 60.7% 37.0% — 537/602 6.9 3.8 53.1% 75.1% 49.9% 58.9% 46.0% 63.3% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Filip Dewulf Nicolas Kiefer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1489 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1528 117.0 +1.19 -1.22 1.032 51.3% +26 — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 — — +0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1563 122.9 +0.33 +1.12 1.067 50.9% +8 -24 — 44.1% +0.09 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.80
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1799 139.8 +1.52 -0.54 1.021 50.8% -25 -229 -48 55.6% +0.30 14–3 (82%) 8–7 (53%) 112.8 +0.64
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1792 151.1 +0.77 +1.69 1.039 50.9% +29 -161 -60 55.6% +0.37 10–11 (48%) 12–8 (60%) 100.3 -0.30
21 1993 1535 120.1 -1.14 -0.09 0.925 48.9% — +42 — 44.4% -0.37 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1999 1923 157.7 +2.57 +3.33 1.144 52.6% +23 -302 -126 65.4% +0.99 15–6 (71%) 16–8 (67%) 110.9 +0.49
22 1994 1513 111.0 -3.41 -4.51 0.660 42.3% +33 +14 — 33.3% -0.97 1–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.42 2000 1900 146.0 +2.09 +2.25 1.124 52.3% +54 -332 -120 61.3% +0.85 9–2 (82%) 7–6 (54%) 104.4 -0.03
23 1995 1691 127.6 +0.34 -1.24 0.950 49.4% -29 -91 — 50.0% -0.28 5–2 (71%) 9–3 (75%) 109.4 +0.57 2001 1763 149.2 -1.17 +2.22 1.001 50.2% +25 -132 +43 53.5% +0.24 6–10 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 97.2 -2.55
24 1996 1563 129.2 -0.52 -0.46 0.964 49.3% +41 -35 — 41.9% -0.39 6–11 (35%) 1–11 (8%) 90.7 -0.82 2002 1718 142.5 -0.77 +1.14 0.977 49.8% +5 -139 +119 46.5% -0.05 4–4 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.4 -0.90
25 1997 1593 133.0 -0.01 +0.39 1.002 50.1% -62 +152 — 50.0% +0.10 4–10 (29%) 5–14 (26%) 89.9 +1.07 2003 1727 134.5 +0.10 +0.13 0.980 49.8% +22 -144 +93 48.1% -0.22 6–1 (86%) 3–3 (50%) 106.1 +0.36
26 1998 1732 136.8 +0.67 -1.93 0.952 49.1% -183 +143 -168 51.9% -0.02 5–6 (45%) 13–4 (76%) 106.5 -1.48 2004 1887 148.7 +1.38 +2.62 1.092 51.5% +33 -284 -100 60.2% +0.52 12–6 (67%) 14–7 (67%) 109.1 +0.23
27 1999 1707 107.4 +0.40 -0.59 0.824 46.8% -155 — — 33.3% -1.55 0–1 0–1 — -0.45 2005 1862 154.9 +1.31 +3.44 1.125 52.2% +10 -139 -50 60.9% +0.77 8–8 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 100.4 -1.12
28 2000 1669 116.4 -1.78 -0.40 0.849 47.2% -115 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–1 0–1 — -0.47 2006 1863 140.5 -0.75 +2.34 1.039 50.6% +65 -104 — 60.0% +0.60 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 106.1 +0.78
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1907 153.1 +4.21 +1.95 1.186 52.7% +55 — -153 65.2% +0.94 1–1 8–5 (62%) — -1.12
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1889 153.4 +2.15 +3.22 1.128 51.9% +5 -79 -37 57.0% +0.37 7–5 (58%) 7–4 (64%) 102.3 -1.13
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1762 145.0 -1.02 -0.24 0.930 49.3% +63 +45 +54 48.5% -0.09 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 99.1 -1.73
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1722 106.1 +0.99 -2.77 0.774 46.3% — — +51 27.3% -1.09 1–1 0–1 — -0.60
Career — 1801 134.4 -0.22 -0.93 0.940 48.9% -41 +61 -168 46.2% -0.26 25–34 (42%) 30–42 (42%) 95.8 -0.45 — 1995 155.1 +1.02 +1.86 1.060 51.2% +25 -127 -17 56.7% +0.45 106–67 (61%) 107–77 (58%) 111.9 -1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.