H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Filip Dewulf vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 1-2

Paul Haarhuis holds a 2–1 lead over Filip Dewulf in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paul Haarhuis won the 1997 Stuttgart Masters round of 64 4-6 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Filip Dewulf
BEL Age 54 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Paul Haarhuis
NED Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Haarhuis #61 4-6 6-1 6-3 Filip Dewulf #39 Match data Oct 22, 1997* R64 Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Paul Haarhuis #26 6-3 6-2 Filip Dewulf #47 Match data Apr 12, 1996* R16 Estoril Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Filip Dewulf #69 6-4 6-4 6-4 Paul Haarhuis #20 Match data Jan 17, 1996* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Filip Dewulf #1,378 #39 975 1,801 85 109 43.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Paul Haarhuis #623 #18 1,341 1,887 251 247 50.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Filip Dewulf Paul Haarhuis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1993 5–6 45.5% #168 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1994 4–9 30.8% #134 1,513 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #462 1,488 0 0
23 1995 14–12 53.8% #65 1,690 0 1 1989 9–7 56.2% #57 1,635 0 0
24 1996 19–32 37.3% #96 1,562 0 1 1990 20–25 44.4% #54 1,670 0 0
25 1997 19–23 45.2% #41 1,593 0 2 1991 25–25 50.0% #37 1,729 0 0
26 1998 22–21 51.2% #55 1,731 0 2 1992 33–29 53.2% #39 1,684 0 0
27 1999 1–3 25.0% #326 1,706 0 2 1993 30–26 53.6% #42 1,764 0 0
28 2000 1–3 25.0% #161 1,669 0 2 1994 26–22 54.2% #37 1,715 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1995 33–24 57.9% #19 1,715 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 30–28 51.7% #25 1,735 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 19–25 43.2% #70 1,674 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 20–20 50.0% #74 1,660 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1999 6–15 28.6% #178 1,620 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Filip Dewulf Paul Haarhuis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 1989 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1996 5 11 16 31.3% 5 12 17 29.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
25 1997 5 8 13 38.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1991 14 11 25 56.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1998 4 8 12 33.3% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 20 12 32 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
27 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 12 10 22 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 13 8 21 61.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 13 13 26 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 7 11 18 38.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 6 10 40.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 23 42 65 35.4% 41 42 83 49.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 18 18 36 50.0% — 111 98 209 53.1% 56 70 126 44.4% 28 25 53 52.8% 56 54 110 50.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 161/194 of Filip Dewulf's and 380/436 of Paul Haarhuis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Filip Dewulf Paul Haarhuis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1993 9/11 1.3 2.3 63.2% 63.3% 48.8% 64.4% 44.2% 58.0% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 8/13 2.0 4.1 56.8% 62.6% 38.7% 48.7% 27.2% 52.3% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 26/26 4.3 3.6 56.7% 70.4% 48.4% 59.5% 43.6% 60.7% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1996 46/51 4.5 5.3 51.0% 74.1% 47.0% 52.9% 52.6% 60.8% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 30/42 4.5 5.6 53.6% 71.6% 51.2% 64.2% 46.0% 62.2% 37.9% 1991 44/50 3.8 2.3 58.4% 68.3% 52.1% 45.9% 48.3% 61.5% 40.2%
26 1998 35/43 3.7 4.5 55.7% 73.6% 48.3% 55.4% 49.6% 62.3% 35.9% 1992 55/62 4.0 1.9 59.8% 70.2% 51.8% 63.1% 41.7% 62.7% 38.0%
27 1999 3/4 1.7 4.0 63.6% 63.7% 41.8% 56.6% 23.6% 55.8% 36.4% 1993 51/56 4.0 2.0 59.5% 69.2% 52.2% 60.9% 43.4% 62.2% 38.2%
28 2000 4/4 3.3 2.3 65.1% 65.4% 52.5% 38.1% 28.5% 60.0% 34.0% 1994 43/48 4.2 2.0 59.7% 68.8% 50.0% 64.0% 48.8% 61.1% 37.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 55/57 4.6 2.6 59.8% 68.3% 50.7% 54.3% 40.4% 61.0% 36.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 48/58 4.2 1.8 62.5% 68.2% 51.8% 50.8% 44.9% 62.2% 35.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 37/44 5.3 2.8 59.7% 71.9% 51.2% 59.4% 46.1% 63.5% 37.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 30/40 5.8 3.2 56.4% 71.4% 50.5% 60.7% 45.0% 62.5% 36.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 17/21 5.3 2.4 61.5% 68.9% 48.6% 61.8% 29.9% 61.0% 36.2%
Career — 161/194 3.9 4.6 55.0% 71.3% 48.0% 56.8% 46.4% 60.7% 37.0% — 380/498 4.4 2.3 59.7% 69.4% 51.2% 57.5% 43.9% 62.0% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Filip Dewulf Paul Haarhuis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1993 1535 120.1 -1.14 -0.09 0.925 48.9% — +42 — 44.4% -0.37 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 1513 111.0 -3.41 -4.51 0.660 42.3% +33 +14 — 33.3% -0.97 1–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.42 1988 1489 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04
23 1995 1691 127.6 +0.34 -1.24 0.950 49.4% -29 -91 — 50.0% -0.28 5–2 (71%) 9–3 (75%) 109.4 +0.57 1989 1636 132.2 — — — — -19 -43 — 54.3% +0.30 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) 101.8 +0.52
24 1996 1563 129.2 -0.52 -0.46 0.964 49.3% +41 -35 — 41.9% -0.39 6–11 (35%) 1–11 (8%) 90.7 -0.82 1990 1670 140.9 — — — — -4 -37 -64 46.9% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) 100.3 -1.33
25 1997 1593 133.0 -0.01 +0.39 1.002 50.1% -62 +152 — 50.0% +0.10 4–10 (29%) 5–14 (26%) 89.9 +1.07 1991 1730 144.8 +0.85 +1.66 1.042 50.8% +15 -61 -171 51.1% +0.31 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) 102.5 -2.69
26 1998 1732 136.8 +0.67 -1.93 0.952 49.1% -183 +143 -168 51.9% -0.02 5–6 (45%) 13–4 (76%) 106.5 -1.48 1992 1685 143.9 +1.01 +0.37 1.019 50.2% +33 -24 — 50.3% +0.07 9–8 (53%) 12–15 (44%) 99.9 -0.46
27 1999 1707 107.4 +0.40 -0.59 0.824 46.8% -155 — — 33.3% -1.55 0–1 0–1 — -0.45 1993 1764 141.2 +1.06 +0.08 1.010 50.5% -19 +4 -232 53.5% +0.17 8–9 (47%) 11–11 (50%) 102.1 -0.40
28 2000 1669 116.4 -1.78 -0.40 0.849 47.2% -115 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–1 0–1 — -0.47 1994 1715 147.9 +0.13 -0.29 0.953 49.4% +46 +62 — 50.8% -0.08 10–4 (71%) 8–9 (47%) 104.6 -1.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1716 137.5 -0.59 -0.36 0.931 48.7% +46 -19 -93 50.0% -0.17 18–5 (78%) 11–12 (48%) 106.7 +0.15
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1736 139.0 +0.20 -0.84 0.946 49.0% +10 -47 -15 46.6% -0.19 12–5 (71%) 13–16 (45%) 105.2 +0.88
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1675 138.9 +1.41 -0.41 1.025 50.4% -16 -7 +99 48.7% +0.13 5–13 (28%) 14–12 (54%) 93.4 -0.68
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1660 132.7 +0.38 -1.61 0.960 49.6% +19 -37 +79 48.4% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–7 (46%) 103.3 +1.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1620 127.7 -0.68 -0.73 0.928 48.6% +35 -73 +103 42.4% -0.44 0–6 (0%) 2–7 (22%) 89.4 -1.04
Career — 1801 134.4 -0.22 -0.93 0.940 48.9% -41 +61 -168 46.2% -0.26 25–34 (42%) 30–42 (42%) 95.8 -0.45 — 1888 146.0 +0.48 -0.13 0.982 49.8% +17 -22 -15 49.4% 0.00 84–71 (54%) 97–108 (47%) 102.8 -1.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.