Filip Dewulf
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goran Ivanisevic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 17, 2000 | H2H |
| Albert Costa | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 1, 1998 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 31, 1998 | H2H |
| Alex Corretja | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 11, 1998 | H2H |
| Johan Van Herck | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 18, 1998 | — |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Richard Krajicek holds a 1–0 lead over Filip Dewulf in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richard Krajicek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1997 Vienna Open round of 32 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | 6-2 6-4 | Filip Dewulf | Match data | Oct 9, 1997* | R32 | Vienna Open | Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filip Dewulf | #1,378 | #39 | 975 | 1,801 | 85 | 109 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,048 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 17 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Filip Dewulf | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,949 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1993 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #168 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1994 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #134 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1995 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,834 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1996 | 19–32 | 37.3% | #96 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,878 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 1997 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #41 | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,958 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,983 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #326 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,881 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,836 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,761 | 1 | 17 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Filip Dewulf | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 28 | 10 | 38 | 73.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 21 | 1993 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 22 | 1994 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1994 | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 23 | 1995 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% | 1995 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 18 | 4 | 22 | 81.8% |
| 24 | 1996 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 1996 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% |
| 25 | 1997 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 1997 | 21 | 8 | 29 | 72.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% |
| 26 | 1998 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1998 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% |
| 27 | 1999 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 30 | 12 | 42 | 71.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% |
| 28 | 2000 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| Career | — | 23 | 42 | 65 | 35.4% | 41 | 42 | 83 | 49.4% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 18 | 18 | 36 | 50.0% | — | 189 | 91 | 280 | 67.5% | 76 | 43 | 119 | 63.9% | 63 | 26 | 89 | 70.8% | 80 | 47 | 127 | 63.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 161/194 of Filip Dewulf's and 530/615 of Richard Krajicek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Filip Dewulf | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 40/46 | 9.2 | 4.0 | 55.3% | 77.4% | 51.6% | 57.8% | 43.4% | 65.8% | 37.4% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 61/71 | 11.0 | 3.5 | 58.4% | 79.2% | 54.5% | 65.0% | 41.3% | 68.9% | 37.9% |
| 21 | 1993 | 9/11 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 63.2% | 63.3% | 48.8% | 64.4% | 44.2% | 58.0% | 38.8% | 1993 | 46/56 | 10.3 | 4.3 | 60.2% | 81.1% | 50.7% | 57.7% | 47.2% | 69.1% | 37.8% |
| 22 | 1994 | 8/13 | 2.0 | 4.1 | 56.8% | 62.6% | 38.7% | 48.7% | 27.2% | 52.3% | 31.5% | 1994 | 42/45 | 11.7 | 4.0 | 55.0% | 81.2% | 50.6% | 70.8% | 47.6% | 67.7% | 38.1% |
| 23 | 1995 | 26/26 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 56.7% | 70.4% | 48.4% | 59.5% | 43.6% | 60.7% | 37.3% | 1995 | 54/60 | 11.5 | 3.1 | 59.0% | 79.1% | 51.2% | 70.1% | 41.8% | 67.7% | 36.1% |
| 24 | 1996 | 46/51 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 51.0% | 74.1% | 47.0% | 52.9% | 52.6% | 60.8% | 37.8% | 1996 | 61/70 | 12.8 | 3.4 | 58.1% | 82.1% | 49.2% | 60.1% | 41.1% | 68.2% | 37.3% |
| 25 | 1997 | 30/42 | 4.5 | 5.6 | 53.6% | 71.6% | 51.2% | 64.2% | 46.0% | 62.2% | 37.9% | 1997 | 61/69 | 14.3 | 3.1 | 57.8% | 85.0% | 53.3% | 65.0% | 43.2% | 71.7% | 37.3% |
| 26 | 1998 | 35/43 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 55.7% | 73.6% | 48.3% | 55.4% | 49.6% | 62.3% | 35.9% | 1998 | 50/61 | 14.9 | 3.4 | 59.8% | 82.3% | 53.6% | 57.2% | 44.1% | 70.7% | 36.9% |
| 27 | 1999 | 3/4 | 1.7 | 4.0 | 63.6% | 63.7% | 41.8% | 56.6% | 23.6% | 55.8% | 36.4% | 1999 | 47/62 | 13.4 | 2.8 | 61.1% | 82.0% | 52.2% | 64.0% | 43.5% | 70.4% | 37.8% |
| 28 | 2000 | 4/4 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 65.1% | 65.4% | 52.5% | 38.1% | 28.5% | 60.0% | 34.0% | 2000 | 35/41 | 14.9 | 3.4 | 58.6% | 82.2% | 55.1% | 59.5% | 35.2% | 71.0% | 36.7% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 12/13 | 15.7 | 6.6 | 53.3% | 81.8% | 49.0% | 67.7% | 43.4% | 66.1% | 34.1% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 21/21 | 12.9 | 5.4 | 52.1% | 79.9% | 48.0% | 67.4% | 45.6% | 64.4% | 34.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Filip Dewulf | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1746 | 141.4 | +4.23 | -0.01 | 1.092 | 51.2% | -23 | -142 | -131 | 56.0% | +0.54 | 9–9 (50%) | 10–12 (45%) | 101.8 | -1.45 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1949 | 161.3 | +6.70 | +1.48 | 1.220 | 53.2% | +15 | -266 | -275 | 63.5% | +0.94 | 14–9 (61%) | 18–17 (51%) | 104.9 | -1.66 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1535 | 120.1 | -1.14 | -0.09 | 0.925 | 48.9% | — | +42 | — | 44.4% | -0.37 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.29 | 1993 | 1885 | 155.4 | +6.73 | +0.19 | 1.222 | 53.3% | -30 | +5 | -123 | 60.6% | +0.72 | 11–8 (58%) | 14–15 (48%) | 98.9 | -1.17 |
| 22 | 1994 | 1513 | 111.0 | -3.41 | -4.51 | 0.660 | 42.3% | +33 | +14 | — | 33.3% | -0.97 | 1–1 | 0–6 (0%) | — | +0.42 | 1994 | 1883 | 152.7 | +5.16 | +0.47 | 1.178 | 52.9% | -19 | +63 | -64 | 69.4% | +1.08 | 2–6 (25%) | 12–12 (50%) | 93.0 | +0.23 |
| 23 | 1995 | 1691 | 127.6 | +0.34 | -1.24 | 0.950 | 49.4% | -29 | -91 | — | 50.0% | -0.28 | 5–2 (71%) | 9–3 (75%) | 109.4 | +0.57 | 1995 | 1835 | 148.6 | +4.66 | -0.97 | 1.118 | 51.8% | +66 | +23 | -81 | 64.6% | +0.80 | 11–8 (58%) | 16–15 (52%) | 98.8 | +1.78 |
| 24 | 1996 | 1563 | 129.2 | -0.52 | -0.46 | 0.964 | 49.3% | +41 | -35 | — | 41.9% | -0.39 | 6–11 (35%) | 1–11 (8%) | 90.7 | -0.82 | 1996 | 1879 | 156.6 | +5.72 | +0.26 | 1.174 | 52.7% | -76 | +74 | +133 | 64.5% | +0.84 | 11–4 (73%) | 22–16 (58%) | 108.1 | +0.05 |
| 25 | 1997 | 1593 | 133.0 | -0.01 | +0.39 | 1.002 | 50.1% | -62 | +152 | — | 50.0% | +0.10 | 4–10 (29%) | 5–14 (26%) | 89.9 | +1.07 | 1997 | 1958 | 153.7 | +8.64 | +0.43 | 1.320 | 54.0% | -8 | -40 | +49 | 69.5% | +1.20 | 8–6 (57%) | 20–22 (48%) | 98.1 | -0.46 |
| 26 | 1998 | 1732 | 136.8 | +0.67 | -1.93 | 0.952 | 49.1% | -183 | +143 | -168 | 51.9% | -0.02 | 5–6 (45%) | 13–4 (76%) | 106.5 | -1.48 | 1998 | 1984 | 154.9 | +7.61 | +0.20 | 1.259 | 53.5% | -7 | -50 | +57 | 69.1% | +1.13 | 17–6 (74%) | 24–12 (67%) | 107.8 | +0.64 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1707 | 107.4 | +0.40 | -0.59 | 0.824 | 46.8% | -155 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.55 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.45 | 1999 | 1881 | 155.6 | +6.78 | +0.75 | 1.279 | 53.6% | +61 | -29 | +52 | 66.0% | +1.16 | 5–7 (42%) | 12–15 (44%) | 89.7 | +0.83 |
| 28 | 2000 | 1669 | 116.4 | -1.78 | -0.40 | 0.849 | 47.2% | -115 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.30 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.47 | 2000 | 1880 | 150.8 | +7.72 | -0.11 | 1.266 | 53.1% | +52 | -32 | +50 | 61.1% | +0.86 | 5–4 (56%) | 8–12 (40%) | 94.8 | -1.68 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1837 | 125.9 | +3.14 | -0.36 | 1.008 | 50.0% | +25 | — | +75 | 59.5% | +0.32 | 2–3 (40%) | 5–3 (63%) | 98.6 | -0.73 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1762 | 123.4 | +1.62 | -1.25 | 0.973 | 49.6% | +3 | +73 | +168 | 48.1% | +0.06 | 5–2 (71%) | 5–8 (38%) | 98.1 | -0.47 |
| Career | — | 1801 | 134.4 | -0.22 | -0.93 | 0.940 | 48.9% | -41 | +61 | -168 | 46.2% | -0.26 | 25–34 (42%) | 30–42 (42%) | 95.8 | -0.45 | — | 2049 | 158.4 | +6.18 | +0.22 | 1.195 | 52.8% | +5 | -20 | +4 | 63.9% | +0.89 | 100–72 (58%) | 166–159 (51%) | 99.5 | -0.67 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goran Ivanisevic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 17, 2000 | H2H |
| Albert Costa | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 1, 1998 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 31, 1998 | H2H |
| Alex Corretja | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 11, 1998 | H2H |
| Johan Van Herck | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 18, 1998 | — |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Stich | 6 | 7 | 13 | Apr 24, 1997 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 3 | 8 | 11 | Nov 1, 1998 | H2H |
| Greg Rusedski | 4 | 6 | 10 | Oct 27, 2000 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 7 | 3 | 10 | Aug 3, 2000 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 5 | 4 | 9 | Sep 8, 2000 | H2H |