H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Flavio Cipolla vs Prakash Amritraj H2H: 0-1
Prakash Amritraj holds a 1–0 lead over Flavio Cipolla in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Prakash Amritraj leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Prakash Amritraj won the 2013 Newport third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 42
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 42
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2013* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Prakash Amritraj | 6-2 6-3 | Flavio Cipolla | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavio Cipolla | #543 | #70 | 736 | 1,786 | 35 | 66 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Prakash Amritraj | #1,181 | #154 | 475 | 1,584 | 13 | 22 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Flavio Cipolla | Prakash Amritraj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #714 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #280 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #340 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #393 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #278 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #127 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #210 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #75 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #95 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #188 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #362 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |