H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Florian Mayer vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 1-1

Florian Mayer and Nicolas Kiefer are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Kiefer leads 1–0 on carpet, while Florian Mayer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2005 Moscow round of 16 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Florian Mayer
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Kiefer #37 6-4 6-3 Florian Mayer #80 Match data Oct 14, 2005* R16 Moscow ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Florian Mayer #51 6-4 6-2 Nicolas Kiefer #24 Match data Mar 23, 2005* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Florian Mayer #256 #18 1,735 1,956 227 251 47.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,995 347 255 57.6% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Florian Mayer Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,563 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,799 0 1
20 2004 19–17 52.8% #35 1,724 0 0 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,792 0 1
21 2005 20–24 45.5% #72 1,723 0 0 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,922 0 4
22 2006 24–21 53.3% #56 1,719 0 0 2000 30–16 65.2% #20 1,900 0 6
23 2007 17–23 42.5% #55 1,618 0 0 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,763 0 6
24 2008 2–9 18.2% #409 1,537 0 0 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,717 0 6
25 2009 3–6 33.3% #61 1,666 0 0 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2010 21–19 52.5% #37 1,801 0 0 2004 34–20 63.0% #21 1,886 0 6
27 2011 42–24 63.6% #23 1,940 0 1 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,862 0 6
28 2012 19–24 44.2% #28 1,798 0 1 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,863 0 6
29 2013 27–25 51.9% #40 1,861 0 1 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,906 0 6
30 2014 7–7 50.0% #147 1,888 0 1 2008 22–17 56.4% #38 1,889 0 6
31 2015 4–9 30.8% #217 1,790 0 1 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,762 0 6
32 2016 10–11 47.6% #50 1,811 0 2 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,722 0 6
33 2017 10–17 37.0% #69 1,760 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2018 2–15 11.8% #256 1,594 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Florian Mayer Nicolas Kiefer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 7 5 12 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 11 5 16 68.8%
20 2004 3 6 9 33.3% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 24 15 39 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 41 15 56 73.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2007 10 12 22 45.5% 4 9 13 30.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 2008 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 10 15 25 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2010 13 14 27 48.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2004 30 14 44 68.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2011 23 15 38 60.5% 16 7 23 69.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2005 15 13 28 53.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
28 2012 9 13 22 40.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2006 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2013 13 15 28 46.4% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 17 9 26 65.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 2014 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 12 11 23 52.2% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
31 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 4 7 11 36.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2016 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 0 5 5 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 99 131 230 43.0% 86 90 176 48.9% 39 26 65 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — 221 145 366 60.4% 47 55 102 46.1% 44 30 74 59.5% 35 25 60 58.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/478 of Florian Mayer's and 537/601 of Nicolas Kiefer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Florian Mayer Nicolas Kiefer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 6/6 4.7 2.3 61.5% 72.6% 51.3% 62.7% 44.1% 64.8% 36.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 11/16 6.1 2.5 52.2% 76.6% 47.8% 53.2% 49.7% 62.7% 39.8%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 37/42 7.9 3.5 55.2% 77.0% 48.3% 60.5% 52.5% 64.1% 36.7%
20 2004 35/36 4.6 2.6 60.1% 69.0% 52.0% 58.7% 40.5% 62.2% 38.3% 1998 49/56 6.2 4.7 53.7% 74.8% 47.8% 55.1% 44.4% 62.5% 39.0%
21 2005 44/44 3.5 2.0 61.7% 67.4% 46.5% 53.8% 43.3% 59.4% 36.3% 1999 56/74 6.6 4.3 51.5% 75.7% 53.2% 61.8% 43.5% 64.7% 40.4%
22 2006 45/45 4.5 1.7 61.9% 72.5% 51.2% 52.6% 45.0% 64.2% 40.6% 2000 38/46 6.4 4.3 52.7% 74.9% 52.3% 61.7% 48.3% 64.3% 40.1%
23 2007 40/40 4.6 1.8 61.8% 68.4% 49.5% 47.5% 40.6% 61.2% 37.3% 2001 44/51 6.3 4.1 50.3% 71.1% 48.8% 54.0% 50.7% 60.0% 40.0%
24 2008 11/11 2.5 1.5 61.1% 63.4% 45.6% 47.0% 45.2% 56.5% 35.8% 2002 40/43 6.2 4.5 52.6% 74.1% 47.8% 58.8% 50.7% 61.5% 37.6%
25 2009 9/9 3.4 1.4 64.7% 67.8% 52.8% 50.1% 29.9% 62.7% 37.1% 2003 36/36 6.5 3.8 50.8% 73.1% 49.9% 58.1% 44.7% 61.8% 37.4%
26 2010 39/40 4.3 1.7 63.6% 71.3% 53.1% 64.5% 39.5% 64.4% 37.1% 2004 51/54 7.3 3.8 54.9% 77.8% 48.4% 61.1% 41.4% 64.5% 38.7%
27 2011 66/66 3.7 2.0 59.8% 71.3% 52.7% 58.4% 47.5% 63.6% 39.3% 2005 52/53 7.6 3.8 53.4% 74.2% 51.4% 56.4% 51.3% 63.6% 40.9%
28 2012 42/43 4.2 1.3 61.0% 70.9% 53.0% 57.4% 41.7% 63.7% 34.8% 2006 21/22 7.4 4.0 51.7% 72.0% 50.1% 59.5% 43.3% 61.3% 40.2%
29 2013 52/52 4.4 1.7 63.1% 68.4% 51.5% 55.8% 41.8% 62.2% 37.0% 2007 30/31 6.7 2.5 57.0% 79.9% 51.6% 64.6% 33.9% 67.8% 38.1%
30 2014 13/14 6.0 1.4 62.6% 66.6% 52.3% 60.8% 49.8% 61.3% 38.3% 2008 34/39 7.2 2.4 53.6% 76.3% 51.9% 55.4% 44.9% 64.9% 39.6%
31 2015 13/13 5.1 1.5 64.0% 64.3% 47.6% 58.8% 43.2% 58.3% 33.9% 2009 28/28 7.7 3.9 52.0% 75.0% 47.3% 62.9% 45.8% 61.9% 35.4%
32 2016 20/21 4.6 1.5 63.3% 71.2% 49.8% 53.8% 41.2% 63.3% 34.1% 2010 4/4 11.3 6.5 51.8% 77.7% 47.3% 55.7% 31.0% 63.0% 28.6%
33 2017 27/27 4.2 1.7 61.4% 69.6% 51.3% 61.8% 42.9% 62.5% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 17/17 3.6 2.1 59.2% 65.5% 48.4% 59.0% 36.4% 58.5% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 473/478 4.2 1.8 61.7% 69.4% 50.9% 56.3% 42.6% 62.2% 36.9% — 537/602 6.9 3.8 53.1% 75.1% 49.9% 58.9% 46.0% 63.3% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Florian Mayer Nicolas Kiefer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1489 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1528 117.0 +1.19 -1.22 1.032 51.3% +26 — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 — — +0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1563 122.9 +0.33 +1.12 1.067 50.9% +8 -24 — 44.1% +0.09 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.80
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1799 139.8 +1.52 -0.54 1.021 50.8% -25 -229 -48 55.6% +0.30 14–3 (82%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.64
20 2004 1725 137.2 +0.54 +1.23 1.014 50.1% -126 -13 -31 53.9% +0.13 2–3 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.20 1998 1792 151.1 +0.77 +1.69 1.039 50.9% +29 -161 -60 55.6% +0.37 10–11 (48%) 12–8 (60%) — -0.30
21 2005 1724 137.0 -2.41 -0.72 0.893 48.1% -85 +5 +29 43.8% -0.60 7–3 (70%) 6–6 (50%) — -2.13 1999 1923 157.7 +2.57 +3.33 1.144 52.6% +23 -302 -126 65.4% +0.99 15–6 (71%) 16–8 (67%) — +0.49
22 2006 1720 136.8 +1.98 +2.41 1.131 52.0% -75 +52 +39 52.3% +0.34 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.24 2000 1900 146.0 +2.09 +2.25 1.124 52.3% +54 -332 -120 61.3% +0.85 9–2 (82%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.03
23 2007 1619 134.0 -0.59 +0.75 0.962 49.0% +27 +49 +119 43.4% -0.28 4–5 (44%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.57 2001 1763 149.2 -1.17 +2.22 1.001 50.2% +25 -132 +43 53.5% +0.24 6–10 (38%) 7–5 (58%) — -2.55
24 2008 1538 114.4 -3.82 -1.01 0.823 46.3% +41 — — 22.7% -1.23 0–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.13 2002 1718 142.5 -0.77 +1.14 0.977 49.8% +5 -139 +119 46.5% -0.05 4–4 (50%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.90
25 2009 1667 132.6 -0.44 -0.02 0.994 49.6% +28 — — 39.1% -0.30 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.01 2003 1727 134.5 +0.10 +0.13 0.980 49.8% +22 -144 +93 48.1% -0.22 6–1 (86%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.36
26 2010 1801 152.2 +1.23 +0.62 1.044 50.8% -13 -82 +3 53.6% +0.29 8–5 (62%) 10–7 (59%) — -0.46 2004 1887 148.7 +1.38 +2.62 1.092 51.5% +33 -284 -100 60.2% +0.52 12–6 (67%) 14–7 (67%) — +0.23
27 2011 1941 154.2 +1.16 +2.09 1.081 51.2% -21 -47 -127 59.2% +0.39 9–4 (69%) 13–6 (68%) — +1.25 2005 1862 154.9 +1.31 +3.44 1.125 52.2% +10 -139 -50 60.9% +0.77 8–8 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.12
28 2012 1799 150.3 +0.84 -1.03 0.960 49.3% -6 -9 +188 48.5% -0.12 4–4 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.65 2006 1863 140.5 -0.75 +2.34 1.039 50.6% +65 -104 — 60.0% +0.60 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.78
29 2013 1861 153.3 -0.17 +0.37 0.978 49.6% -38 -39 +104 49.2% -0.08 10–6 (63%) 8–10 (44%) — +0.13 2007 1907 153.1 +4.21 +1.95 1.186 52.7% +55 — -153 65.2% +0.94 1–1 8–5 (62%) — -1.12
30 2014 1889 146.1 -0.12 +1.13 0.988 49.5% -31 — — 56.8% +0.05 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.70 2008 1889 153.4 +2.15 +3.22 1.128 51.9% +5 -79 -37 57.0% +0.37 7–5 (58%) 7–4 (64%) — -1.13
31 2015 1790 121.4 -3.24 -0.95 0.812 46.4% — -41 +139 37.5% -1.09 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.28 2009 1762 145.0 -1.02 -0.24 0.930 49.3% +63 +45 +54 48.5% -0.09 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.73
32 2016 1811 135.4 -0.43 -0.48 0.929 48.7% -17 -148 +181 40.4% -0.47 3–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) — -2.04 2010 1722 106.1 +0.99 -2.77 0.774 46.3% — — +51 27.3% -1.09 1–1 0–1 — -0.60
33 2017 1760 136.7 -0.19 -1.94 0.865 48.0% -94 -20 +178 35.6% -0.68 3–4 (43%) 1–11 (8%) — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 1594 122.8 -3.14 -1.85 0.807 46.1% +12 +22 +258 20.9% -1.54 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1956 149.9 -0.06 +0.39 0.978 49.5% -29 -15 +102 47.6% -0.15 61–52 (54%) 71–87 (45%) 100.8 -1.05 — 1995 155.1 +1.02 +1.86 1.060 51.2% +25 -127 -17 56.7% +0.45 106–67 (61%) 107–77 (58%) 111.9 -1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.