H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Frances Tiafoe vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles H2H: 1-0
Frances Tiafoe holds a 1–0 lead over Bernabe Zapata Miralles in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frances Tiafoe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frances Tiafoe won the 2022 Tokyo fourth round 6-1 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 29
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2022* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Frances Tiafoe | 6-1 7-6(7) | Bernabe Zapata Miralles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frances Tiafoe | #17 | #10 | 3,130 | 2,015 | 254 | 211 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Bernabe Zapata Miralles | #491 | #37 | 1,051 | 1,809 | 36 | 62 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frances Tiafoe | Bernabe Zapata Miralles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #108 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #79 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #39 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #266 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #59 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,927 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,979 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #16 | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #18 | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #80 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #30 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #272 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,941 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #451 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |