H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Frances Tiafoe vs Elias Ymer H2H: 2-0
Frances Tiafoe holds a 2–0 lead over Elias Ymer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Frances Tiafoe leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frances Tiafoe won the 2022 Stockholm fourth round 3-6 7-6(4) 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Sweden
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2022* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Frances Tiafoe | 3-6 7-6(4) 7-6(2) | Elias Ymer | Match data |
| Nov 10, 2021* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Frances Tiafoe | 6-4 7-6(2) | Elias Ymer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frances Tiafoe | #17 | #10 | 3,130 | 2,015 | 254 | 211 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Elias Ymer | #183 | #105 | 534 | 1,696 | 29 | 68 | 29.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frances Tiafoe | Elias Ymer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #769 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #108 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #79 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #39 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #160 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #59 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,927 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,979 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #16 | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #170 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #18 | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #30 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #155 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,941 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #327 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |