H2H data updated: 2026-10-08 00:00 UTC

Frances Tiafoe vs Gilles Muller H2H: 1-0

Frances Tiafoe holds a 1–0 lead over Gilles Muller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frances Tiafoe leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Frances Tiafoe won the 2018 Estoril Open second round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Frances Tiafoe
United States Age 28 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Frances Tiafoe #64 6-4 7-5 Gilles Muller #28 Match data May 4, 2018* R16 Estoril Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frances Tiafoe #8 #8 3,380 2,030 267 217 55.2% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,076 203 202 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Frances Tiafoe Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 0–1 0.0% — 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 1–5 16.7% #176 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2016 1–6 14.3% #108 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 7–17 29.2% #79 1,706 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 2018 27–22 55.1% #39 1,818 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 2019 21–25 45.7% #47 1,800 0 1 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,600 0 0
22 2020 9–11 45.0% #59 1,815 0 1 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,728 0 0
23 2021 32–24 57.1% #38 1,927 0 1 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,534 0 0
24 2022 34–23 59.6% #19 1,979 0 1 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,577 0 0
25 2023 34–19 64.2% #16 1,896 0 3 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,672 0 0
26 2024 32–25 56.1% #18 1,898 0 3 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,632 0 0
27 2025 26–21 55.3% #30 1,814 0 3 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,610 0 0
28 2026 43–18 70.5% #8 1,999 0 4 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2012 21–21 50.0% #67 1,839 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2013 2–8 20.0% #368 1,678 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,737 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2016 35–24 59.3% #34 1,968 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,943 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,689 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Frances Tiafoe Gilles Muller
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 6 13 19 31.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2018 17 15 32 53.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 16 17 33 48.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2004 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2020 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 12 11 23 52.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2021 25 16 41 61.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2022 23 14 37 62.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2023 19 13 32 59.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2008 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2024 24 17 41 58.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2025 14 12 26 53.8% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2026 27 12 39 69.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2011 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 14 14 28 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 23 18 41 56.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 22 17 39 56.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
Career — 182 147 329 55.3% 52 48 100 52.0% 33 22 55 60.0% — — — — — 137 131 268 51.1% 19 30 49 38.8% 45 36 81 55.6% 2 5 7 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 482/486 of Frances Tiafoe's and 397/405 of Gilles Muller's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Frances Tiafoe Gilles Muller
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 1/1 2.0 6.0 54.9% 74.4% 40.6% 75.0% 33.3% 59.2% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 6/6 9.0 2.5 59.8% 71.7% 48.9% 60.8% 21.2% 62.2% 30.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 7/7 5.7 2.6 64.1% 67.8% 52.2% 49.8% 35.1% 62.1% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 24/24 8.1 3.1 58.9% 70.8% 52.8% 50.2% 39.0% 63.2% 34.2% 2002 1/1 13.0 3.0 60.4% 77.6% 38.6% 70.0% 25.0% 62.2% 34.3%
20 2018 49/49 7.8 3.0 61.0% 72.9% 52.9% 61.8% 40.6% 65.0% 35.2% 2003 1/1 3.0 3.0 49.2% 56.7% 67.7% 33.3% 25.0% 62.3% 40.3%
21 2019 46/46 6.0 2.4 65.4% 70.9% 50.9% 53.2% 39.8% 64.2% 35.5% 2004 18/18 8.2 3.0 61.1% 70.3% 53.4% 48.8% 53.1% 63.5% 36.9%
22 2020 20/20 4.6 2.1 63.1% 69.7% 50.0% 59.7% 43.0% 62.4% 37.0% 2005 41/41 9.2 3.6 60.8% 73.4% 50.7% 64.0% 42.8% 64.5% 31.5%
23 2021 54/56 7.1 2.5 61.0% 72.0% 53.5% 60.2% 40.5% 64.9% 36.6% 2006 31/31 9.1 3.8 61.0% 72.5% 48.9% 64.2% 32.8% 63.0% 32.9%
24 2022 57/57 8.5 2.4 58.0% 73.6% 52.9% 66.2% 40.3% 64.9% 35.6% 2007 5/5 15.6 3.6 66.8% 72.1% 50.4% 56.1% 41.8% 64.9% 33.6%
25 2023 53/53 8.3 2.3 60.0% 77.0% 52.9% 62.6% 43.2% 67.4% 35.9% 2008 11/11 19.4 4.0 61.7% 77.1% 48.6% 69.2% 32.8% 66.0% 28.3%
26 2024 57/57 8.5 2.5 59.2% 74.6% 54.1% 62.6% 38.0% 66.1% 35.1% 2009 13/14 12.3 3.5 60.5% 74.5% 51.2% 57.7% 29.7% 65.5% 30.0%
27 2025 47/47 8.2 2.7 56.1% 74.5% 52.0% 56.9% 41.1% 64.5% 37.3% 2010 4/4 17.3 3.3 64.5% 81.3% 58.3% 50.0% 16.8% 72.8% 26.6%
28 2026 61/63 6.4 2.3 61.0% 74.2% 54.3% 61.3% 41.2% 66.2% 36.0% 2011 25/25 15.5 3.1 60.2% 80.0% 49.9% 63.1% 42.9% 68.4% 29.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 40/42 13.5 3.1 62.1% 81.2% 47.5% 64.0% 36.9% 68.6% 30.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 10/10 11.2 3.5 59.1% 73.6% 45.8% 58.0% 33.2% 62.3% 27.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 10/10 16.8 4.0 62.0% 76.4% 49.0% 49.3% 24.9% 66.4% 28.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 55/55 13.9 3.7 60.6% 79.6% 50.8% 69.0% 39.4% 68.4% 32.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 56/59 15.3 3.6 60.8% 82.1% 53.2% 61.4% 37.0% 70.6% 32.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 48/50 14.7 3.9 63.0% 80.1% 52.7% 70.9% 43.0% 69.6% 32.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 28/28 15.0 4.8 61.4% 78.3% 47.3% 58.5% 28.4% 66.2% 31.1%
Career — 482/486 7.5 2.5 60.3% 73.3% 52.8% 60.1% 40.3% 65.1% 35.7% — 397/405 13.4 3.6 61.3% 77.9% 50.6% 63.2% 37.8% 67.3% 31.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Frances Tiafoe Gilles Muller
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1469 99.7 -1.83 -1.00 0.700 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1488 112.1 -2.26 -2.21 0.806 46.2% +2 — — 23.5% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.8 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1508 116.9 -1.57 +0.56 0.914 48.1% -4 — — 30.0% -0.85 1–3 (25%) 1–5 (17%) 98.5 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1706 146.8 -0.17 -0.03 0.930 48.7% +4 — -121 38.2% -0.41 2–8 (20%) 2–11 (15%) 92.8 -1.15 2002 1488 100.0 -3.28 -2.21 0.908 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06
20 2018 1818 149.3 +0.75 +0.31 1.007 50.2% -22 -216 -116 51.6% +0.02 11–7 (61%) 14–11 (56%) 108.6 -1.15 2003 1451 96.0 +2.20 -4.69 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00
21 2019 1801 153.7 +0.57 +0.02 0.990 49.7% +31 -161 -153 48.4% -0.29 6–16 (27%) 14–10 (58%) 94.8 -0.49 2004 1600 126.5 +0.44 -0.24 1.013 50.1% +38 — — 44.2% -0.09 7–1 (88%) 1–6 (14%) 105.2 +0.52
22 2020 1815 147.6 -0.28 -0.04 0.984 49.6% +51 — — 50.0% -0.24 2–6 (25%) 7–5 (58%) 98.5 -1.03 2005 1728 137.8 +2.01 -3.76 0.888 48.6% -9 -178 -152 44.8% -0.60 6–5 (55%) 13–6 (68%) 107.5 -2.15
23 2021 1928 156.0 +2.07 +0.36 1.042 50.8% +30 -311 -225 56.4% +0.34 11–11 (50%) 18–17 (51%) 101.4 -0.63 2006 1535 118.4 -0.34 -3.26 0.890 48.8% +78 -6 -43 36.1% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 5–9 (36%) 92.3 +1.32
24 2022 1979 154.0 +1.43 +0.08 1.012 50.3% +23 -267 -209 58.6% +0.17 12–11 (52%) 28–14 (67%) 106.5 +1.05 2007 1578 104.7 +1.65 -2.99 0.958 49.5% -32 — — 30.8% -0.77 — 1–1 — +0.07
25 2023 1897 150.5 +2.85 +0.22 1.098 51.3% +6 -77 -40 62.2% +0.70 6–5 (55%) 19–13 (59%) 101.5 +2.33 2008 1673 122.4 +2.48 -2.87 0.833 48.5% +20 — — 45.7% -0.34 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 103.7 +0.16
26 2024 1899 146.6 +1.42 +0.07 1.034 50.5% +7 -144 -43 52.7% +0.10 11–9 (55%) 20–18 (53%) 98.7 +3.04 2009 1632 120.3 +1.24 -3.51 0.868 48.1% +68 — -102 40.0% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) 101.7 +0.29
27 2025 1815 142.8 +0.01 +0.86 1.051 50.7% +15 -1 -11 57.5% +0.21 6–10 (38%) 15–7 (68%) 97.0 +3.26 2010 1610 114.3 -1.03 -2.96 0.979 49.2% — — — 50.0% -0.10 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.27
28 2026 2000 155.2 +1.23 +1.18 1.065 51.1% +15 -151 -93 62.2% +0.65 17–6 (74%) 19–16 (54%) 106.9 +1.32 2011 1798 145.1 +4.00 -3.93 0.931 49.6% 0 — -131 55.4% -0.09 2–5 (29%) 16–11 (59%) 101.5 -0.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1840 148.8 +4.06 -4.34 0.979 49.8% +31 -246 -188 46.8% -0.15 10–7 (59%) 16–17 (48%) 102.7 -1.66
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1678 116.7 +0.08 -5.24 0.738 45.9% +82 -165 — 26.1% -1.22 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.20
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1738 140.5 +1.86 -1.97 0.832 47.2% +17 — — 44.4% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 101.0 -0.77
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1894 162.5 +4.09 -2.33 1.019 50.8% -10 -311 -37 53.9% +0.26 11–8 (58%) 27–18 (60%) 107.4 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1968 159.7 +6.13 -2.52 1.108 51.4% -18 — -20 55.2% +0.31 10–8 (56%) 24–21 (53%) 101.5 -1.98
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1943 156.0 +4.71 -2.01 1.074 51.2% -84 -284 +133 59.7% +0.47 9–4 (69%) 19–10 (66%) 107.2 -0.32
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1689 131.0 +1.83 -3.86 0.921 48.7% +16 -65 +271 39.0% -0.55 3–6 (33%) 9–10 (47%) 92.5 +1.28
Career — 2031 155.5 +1.09 +0.32 1.024 50.4% +15 -152 -112 54.3% +0.16 86–94 (48%) 160–129 (55%) 102.3 +1.33 — 2076 149.8 +3.16 -2.99 0.969 49.8% +3 -180 -5 48.3% -0.13 65–58 (53%) 152–124 (55%) 106.3 -1.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.