H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:17 UTC
Frances Tiafoe vs Matteo Arnaldi H2H: 1-2
Matteo Arnaldi holds a 2–1 lead over Frances Tiafoe in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Matteo Arnaldi leads 2–0 on clay, while Frances Tiafoe leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Matteo Arnaldi won the 2026 Roland Garros fourth round 7-6(5) 6-7(5) 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 25
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2026 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Matteo Arnaldi | 7-6(5) 6-7(5) 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | Frances Tiafoe | Match data |
| Apr 30, 2025* | Mutua Madrid Open | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Matteo Arnaldi | 6-3 7-5 | Frances Tiafoe | Match data |
| Jul 3, 2024* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Frances Tiafoe | 6-7(5) 2-6 6-1 6-3 6-3 | Matteo Arnaldi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frances Tiafoe | #17 | #10 | 3,130 | 2,015 | 254 | 211 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Matteo Arnaldi | #34 | #29 | 1,485 | 1,906 | 71 | 73 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frances Tiafoe | Matteo Arnaldi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #108 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #79 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #39 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #59 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #44 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,927 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #37 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,979 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #16 | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #34 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #18 | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #30 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,941 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |