H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Frances Tiafoe vs Nicolas Jarry H2H: 1-1
Frances Tiafoe and Nicolas Jarry are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Frances Tiafoe leads 1–0 on clay, while Nicolas Jarry leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frances Tiafoe won the 2021 Santiago third round 7-6(7) 6-7(7) 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Chile
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2021* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Frances Tiafoe | 7-6(7) 6-7(7) 7-6(7) | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
| Mar 9, 2019* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Nicolas Jarry | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | Frances Tiafoe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frances Tiafoe | #17 | #10 | 3,130 | 2,015 | 254 | 211 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Nicolas Jarry | #211 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,942 | 110 | 117 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frances Tiafoe | Nicolas Jarry | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #108 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #79 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #372 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #39 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #111 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #59 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,927 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #77 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,979 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #16 | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #18 | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #152 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #30 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2026 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,941 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |