H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Frances Tiafoe vs Richard Gasquet H2H: 0-1

Richard Gasquet holds a 1–0 lead over Frances Tiafoe in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richard Gasquet leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2017 Eastbourne Open first round 5-7 7-6(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Frances Tiafoe
United States Age 28 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Gasquet #27 5-7 7-6(4) 6-3 Frances Tiafoe #63 Match data Jun 28, 2017* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frances Tiafoe #12 #10 3,130 2,015 264 215 55.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Frances Tiafoe Richard Gasquet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 0–1 0.0% — 1,469 0 0 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0
17 2015 1–5 16.7% #176 1,487 0 0 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0
18 2016 1–6 14.3% #108 1,507 0 0 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0
19 2017 7–17 29.2% #79 1,706 0 0 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1
20 2018 27–22 55.1% #39 1,818 0 1 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4
21 2019 21–25 45.7% #47 1,800 0 1 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5
22 2020 9–11 45.0% #59 1,815 0 1 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5
23 2021 32–24 57.1% #38 1,927 0 1 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5
24 2022 34–23 59.6% #19 1,979 0 1 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6
25 2023 34–19 64.2% #16 1,896 0 3 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6
26 2024 32–25 56.1% #18 1,898 0 3 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7
27 2025 26–21 55.3% #30 1,814 0 3 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10
28 2026 40–16 71.4% #12 1,995 0 4 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10
29 — — — — — — — 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12
30 — — — — — — — 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14
32 — — — — — — — 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15
33 — — — — — — — 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15
34 — — — — — — — 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15
35 — — — — — — — 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16
38 — — — — — — — 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16
39 — — — — — — — 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Frances Tiafoe Richard Gasquet
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2017 6 13 19 31.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
20 2018 17 15 32 53.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
21 2019 16 17 33 48.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2020 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2021 25 16 41 61.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2022 23 14 37 62.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2023 19 13 32 59.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
26 2024 24 17 41 58.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2025 14 12 26 53.8% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2026 24 10 34 70.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 179 145 324 55.2% 52 48 100 52.0% 33 22 55 60.0% — — — — — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 477/481 of Frances Tiafoe's and 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Frances Tiafoe Richard Gasquet
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 1/1 2.0 6.0 54.9% 74.4% 40.6% 75.0% 33.3% 59.2% 28.6% 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6%
17 2015 6/6 9.0 2.5 59.8% 71.7% 48.9% 60.8% 21.2% 62.2% 30.4% 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6%
18 2016 7/7 5.7 2.6 64.1% 67.8% 52.2% 49.8% 35.1% 62.1% 34.6% 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7%
19 2017 24/24 8.1 3.1 58.9% 70.8% 52.8% 50.2% 39.0% 63.2% 34.2% 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6%
20 2018 49/49 7.8 3.0 61.0% 72.9% 52.9% 61.8% 40.6% 65.0% 35.2% 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2%
21 2019 46/46 6.0 2.4 65.4% 70.9% 50.9% 53.2% 39.8% 64.2% 35.5% 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6%
22 2020 20/20 4.6 2.1 63.1% 69.7% 50.0% 59.7% 43.0% 62.4% 37.0% 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7%
23 2021 54/56 7.1 2.5 61.0% 72.0% 53.5% 60.2% 40.5% 64.9% 36.6% 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1%
24 2022 57/57 8.5 2.4 58.0% 73.6% 52.9% 66.2% 40.3% 64.9% 35.6% 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8%
25 2023 53/53 8.3 2.3 60.0% 77.0% 52.9% 62.6% 43.2% 67.4% 35.9% 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9%
26 2024 57/57 8.5 2.5 59.2% 74.6% 54.1% 62.6% 38.0% 66.1% 35.1% 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1%
27 2025 47/47 8.2 2.7 56.1% 74.5% 52.0% 56.9% 41.1% 64.5% 37.3% 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5%
28 2026 56/58 6.5 2.3 61.3% 74.4% 54.5% 62.4% 41.6% 66.4% 36.2% 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3%
Career — 477/481 7.5 2.5 60.3% 73.4% 52.8% 60.2% 40.3% 65.1% 35.7% — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Frances Tiafoe Richard Gasquet
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1469 99.7 -1.83 -1.00 0.700 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.14 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22
17 2015 1488 112.1 -2.26 -2.21 0.806 46.2% +2 — — 23.5% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.8 -0.24 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06
18 2016 1508 116.9 -1.57 +0.56 0.914 48.1% -4 — — 30.0% -0.85 1–3 (25%) 1–5 (17%) 98.5 0.00 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) 98.0 +0.35
19 2017 1706 146.8 -0.17 -0.03 0.930 48.7% +4 — -121 38.2% -0.41 2–8 (20%) 2–11 (15%) 92.8 -1.15 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) 111.0 +1.52
20 2018 1818 149.3 +0.75 +0.31 1.007 50.2% -22 -216 -116 51.6% +0.02 11–7 (61%) 14–11 (56%) 108.6 -1.15 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) 103.9 -1.51
21 2019 1801 153.7 +0.57 +0.02 0.990 49.7% +31 -161 -153 48.4% -0.29 6–16 (27%) 14–10 (58%) 94.8 -0.49 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) 97.0 +1.61
22 2020 1815 147.6 -0.28 -0.04 0.984 49.6% +51 — — 50.0% -0.24 2–6 (25%) 7–5 (58%) 98.5 -1.03 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 91.6 +0.90
23 2021 1928 156.0 +2.07 +0.36 1.042 50.8% +30 -311 -225 56.4% +0.34 11–11 (50%) 18–17 (51%) 101.4 -0.63 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 104.5 -0.85
24 2022 1979 154.0 +1.43 +0.08 1.012 50.3% +23 -267 -209 58.6% +0.17 12–11 (52%) 28–14 (67%) 106.5 +1.05 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) 100.5 0.00
25 2023 1897 150.5 +2.85 +0.22 1.098 51.3% +6 -77 -40 62.2% +0.70 6–5 (55%) 19–13 (59%) 101.5 +2.33 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) 106.4 +0.44
26 2024 1899 146.6 +1.42 +0.07 1.034 50.5% +7 -144 -43 52.7% +0.10 11–9 (55%) 20–18 (53%) 98.7 +3.04 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) 98.3 +2.77
27 2025 1815 142.8 +0.01 +0.86 1.051 50.7% +15 -1 -11 57.5% +0.21 6–10 (38%) 15–7 (68%) 97.0 +3.26 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) 101.5 +2.10
28 2026 1996 152.2 +1.57 +1.21 1.078 51.3% +2 -150 -91 62.8% +0.72 16–6 (73%) 16–16 (50%) 104.9 +1.55 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) 103.8 +1.40
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) 103.2 -2.22
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) 103.0 +1.59
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 99.0 -0.72
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 -0.58
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) 100.3 -0.68
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -0.26
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 99.3 -0.21
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) 99.4 -2.39
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 101.0 +0.23
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03
Career — 2016 155.1 +1.13 +0.32 1.025 50.4% +13 -151 -112 54.3% +0.16 85–94 (47%) 157–129 (55%) 101.8 +1.39 — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.