H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Frances Tiafoe vs Tomas Berdych H2H: 1-0

Frances Tiafoe holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Berdych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frances Tiafoe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frances Tiafoe won the 2018 Miami Open third round 6-7(2) 6-2 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Frances Tiafoe
United States Age 28 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Frances Tiafoe #63 6-7(2) 6-2 7-6(1) Tomas Berdych #13 Match data Mar 26, 2018* R32 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frances Tiafoe #12 #10 3,130 2,015 262 215 54.9% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,233 599 324 64.9% 0 1 0 3 9 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Frances Tiafoe Tomas Berdych
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 0–1 0.0% — 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 1–5 16.7% #176 1,487 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0
18 2016 1–6 14.3% #108 1,507 0 0 2004 15–14 51.7% #45 1,699 0 1
19 2017 7–17 29.2% #79 1,706 0 0 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,871 0 2
20 2018 27–22 55.1% #39 1,818 0 1 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2
21 2019 21–25 45.7% #47 1,800 0 1 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,909 0 3
22 2020 9–11 45.0% #59 1,815 0 1 2008 32–19 62.7% #20 1,924 0 4
23 2021 32–24 57.1% #38 1,927 0 1 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,888 0 5
24 2022 34–23 59.6% #19 1,979 0 1 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,922 0 5
25 2023 34–19 64.2% #16 1,896 0 3 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,082 0 6
26 2024 32–25 56.1% #18 1,898 0 3 2012 52–21 71.2% #6 2,153 0 8
27 2025 26–21 55.3% #30 1,814 0 3 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,081 0 8
28 2026 38–16 70.4% #12 1,974 0 4 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,083 0 10
29 — — — — — — — 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,111 0 12
30 — — — — — — — 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13
31 — — — — — — — 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,029 0 13
32 — — — — — — — 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,921 0 13
33 — — — — — — — 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,873 0 13

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Frances Tiafoe Tomas Berdych
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 7 5 12 58.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2017 6 13 19 31.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 12 14 26 46.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5%
20 2018 17 15 32 53.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2006 23 14 37 62.2% 10 7 17 58.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2019 16 17 33 48.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2007 21 14 35 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
22 2020 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 25 14 39 64.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
23 2021 25 16 41 61.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 21 16 37 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2022 23 14 37 62.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2010 25 19 44 56.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
25 2023 19 13 32 59.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2011 36 15 51 70.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
26 2024 24 17 41 58.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2012 39 14 53 73.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2025 14 12 26 53.8% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 36 16 52 69.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
28 2026 22 10 32 68.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2014 38 15 53 71.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 40 16 56 71.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 27 13 40 67.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 17 10 27 63.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 10 6 16 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 13 8 21 61.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 177 145 322 55.0% 52 48 100 52.0% 33 22 55 60.0% — — — — — 391 211 602 65.0% 131 79 210 62.4% 68 31 99 68.7% 9 3 12 75.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 475/479 of Frances Tiafoe's and 909/923 of Tomas Berdych's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Frances Tiafoe Tomas Berdych
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 1/1 2.0 6.0 54.9% 74.4% 40.6% 75.0% 33.3% 59.2% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 6/6 9.0 2.5 59.8% 71.7% 48.9% 60.8% 21.2% 62.2% 30.4% 2003 3/3 13.3 4.7 56.4% 72.9% 52.7% 68.7% 29.2% 64.3% 35.1%
18 2016 7/7 5.7 2.6 64.1% 67.8% 52.2% 49.8% 35.1% 62.1% 34.6% 2004 25/29 7.5 3.8 58.1% 72.3% 47.6% 55.4% 42.0% 62.1% 37.8%
19 2017 24/24 8.1 3.1 58.9% 70.8% 52.8% 50.2% 39.0% 63.2% 34.2% 2005 57/57 7.6 2.8 57.3% 74.0% 51.4% 56.0% 44.2% 64.3% 36.2%
20 2018 49/49 7.8 3.0 61.0% 72.9% 52.9% 61.8% 40.6% 65.0% 35.2% 2006 66/66 7.6 2.8 58.6% 76.0% 52.3% 57.2% 43.6% 65.9% 38.9%
21 2019 46/46 6.0 2.4 65.4% 70.9% 50.9% 53.2% 39.8% 64.2% 35.5% 2007 62/63 7.7 2.3 58.9% 78.4% 55.0% 65.5% 48.9% 68.9% 37.7%
22 2020 20/20 4.6 2.1 63.1% 69.7% 50.0% 59.7% 43.0% 62.4% 37.0% 2008 48/51 8.0 2.1 60.3% 76.4% 55.0% 62.4% 46.9% 67.9% 38.5%
23 2021 54/56 7.1 2.5 61.0% 72.0% 53.5% 60.2% 40.5% 64.9% 36.6% 2009 57/57 6.8 2.5 58.9% 74.3% 52.7% 60.4% 39.3% 65.5% 37.5%
24 2022 57/57 8.5 2.4 58.0% 73.6% 52.9% 66.2% 40.3% 64.9% 35.6% 2010 65/65 8.1 2.4 56.4% 79.6% 56.8% 64.4% 43.0% 69.6% 40.2%
25 2023 53/53 8.3 2.3 60.0% 77.0% 52.9% 62.6% 43.2% 67.4% 35.9% 2011 73/74 6.6 2.0 58.1% 77.7% 54.4% 53.0% 43.8% 67.8% 40.5%
26 2024 57/57 8.5 2.5 59.2% 74.6% 54.1% 62.6% 38.0% 66.1% 35.1% 2012 72/73 8.5 2.3 58.8% 78.5% 55.1% 67.5% 45.3% 68.8% 39.5%
27 2025 47/47 8.2 2.7 56.1% 74.5% 52.0% 56.9% 41.1% 64.5% 37.3% 2013 74/75 8.1 2.3 58.6% 78.0% 52.4% 64.1% 43.5% 67.5% 40.0%
28 2026 54/56 6.5 2.3 61.1% 74.2% 54.3% 61.7% 41.4% 66.3% 36.0% 2014 74/75 8.2 2.6 57.5% 78.8% 54.9% 65.2% 41.6% 68.6% 39.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 79/79 7.4 2.0 56.6% 78.0% 55.5% 60.4% 48.5% 68.3% 39.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 57/58 8.4 3.0 57.1% 78.0% 50.4% 58.8% 40.7% 66.2% 36.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 53/53 7.8 2.4 57.8% 78.9% 55.1% 66.9% 51.8% 68.8% 36.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 22/23 8.2 1.9 60.3% 76.5% 50.0% 66.5% 38.8% 66.2% 37.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 22/22 6.7 2.5 59.0% 75.2% 51.5% 64.8% 39.7% 65.4% 36.8%
Career — 475/479 7.5 2.5 60.3% 73.3% 52.8% 60.2% 40.3% 65.1% 35.7% — 909/923 7.8 2.5 58.1% 77.3% 53.6% 61.7% 44.3% 67.4% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Frances Tiafoe Tomas Berdych
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1469 99.7 -1.83 -1.00 0.700 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1488 112.1 -2.26 -2.21 0.806 46.2% +2 — — 23.5% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.24 2003 1526 108.9 +0.33 -1.90 0.983 49.1% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.09
18 2016 1508 116.9 -1.57 +0.56 0.914 48.1% -4 — — 30.0% -0.85 1–3 (25%) 1–5 (17%) — 0.00 2004 1699 136.0 +0.40 +0.09 0.997 50.0% -15 -38 — 48.1% -0.08 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.26
19 2017 1706 146.8 -0.17 -0.03 0.930 48.7% +4 — -121 38.2% -0.41 2–8 (20%) 2–11 (15%) — -1.15 2005 1871 147.6 +2.21 -0.32 1.012 50.3% -3 -159 -286 54.1% +0.29 12–11 (52%) 13–14 (48%) — -2.61
20 2018 1818 149.3 +0.75 +0.31 1.007 50.2% -22 -216 -116 51.6% +0.02 11–7 (61%) 14–11 (56%) — -1.15 2006 1934 149.9 +3.95 +1.79 1.142 52.2% -25 -144 -133 59.6% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.19
21 2019 1801 153.7 +0.57 +0.02 0.990 49.7% +31 -161 -153 48.4% -0.29 6–16 (27%) 14–10 (58%) — -0.49 2007 1909 153.2 +5.09 +1.51 1.210 53.2% -28 -81 +50 65.3% +1.03 6–5 (55%) 20–12 (63%) — +1.36
22 2020 1815 147.6 -0.28 -0.04 0.984 49.6% +51 — — 50.0% -0.24 2–6 (25%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.03 2008 1924 157.2 +4.14 +2.63 1.197 53.0% +18 -89 +16 61.1% +0.86 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.54
23 2021 1928 156.0 +2.07 +0.36 1.042 50.8% +30 -311 -225 56.4% +0.34 11–11 (50%) 18–17 (51%) — -0.63 2009 1889 149.6 +1.93 +1.34 1.088 51.1% +8 -68 +89 56.1% +0.35 13–11 (54%) 14–8 (64%) — +1.55
24 2022 1979 154.0 +1.43 +0.08 1.012 50.3% +23 -267 -209 58.6% +0.17 12–11 (52%) 28–14 (67%) — +1.05 2010 1922 165.7 +5.92 +4.41 1.325 54.2% -60 +13 +227 62.2% +1.05 10–12 (45%) 10–15 (40%) — +0.74
25 2023 1897 150.5 +2.85 +0.22 1.098 51.3% +6 -77 -40 62.2% +0.70 6–5 (55%) 19–13 (59%) — +2.33 2011 2083 169.8 +5.45 +3.99 1.258 54.0% +29 -160 +53 69.2% +1.41 11–7 (61%) 13–7 (65%) — +2.97
26 2024 1899 146.6 +1.42 +0.07 1.034 50.5% +7 -144 -43 52.7% +0.10 11–9 (55%) 20–18 (53%) — +3.04 2012 2154 175.6 +5.87 +4.18 1.263 54.1% +29 -74 -142 66.3% +1.18 12–7 (63%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.55
27 2025 1815 142.8 +0.01 +0.86 1.051 50.7% +15 -1 -11 57.5% +0.21 6–10 (38%) 15–7 (68%) — +3.26 2013 2082 173.8 +4.74 +4.38 1.231 53.4% +45 -31 -22 67.2% +1.15 9–11 (45%) 17–17 (50%) — +0.42
28 2026 1975 151.8 +1.33 +1.11 1.069 51.1% 0 -129 -72 61.3% +0.66 16–6 (73%) 15–16 (48%) — +1.33 2014 2084 170.2 +4.10 +3.96 1.243 53.3% +44 -21 -19 68.2% +1.12 9–9 (50%) 9–16 (36%) — +3.87
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2112 176.1 +5.06 +4.69 1.258 53.9% +44 +48 -47 67.7% +1.11 9–5 (64%) 24–10 (71%) — +2.13
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2081 169.7 +3.41 +1.04 1.085 51.4% +7 +79 +38 60.9% +0.72 11–3 (79%) 15–14 (52%) — -0.93
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 2029 162.0 +4.46 +0.86 1.159 52.5% -34 +39 +113 61.1% +0.67 7–8 (47%) 16–13 (55%) — -1.68
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1922 155.3 +2.29 +0.98 1.096 51.6% +93 +39 +185 53.4% +0.60 1–6 (14%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.07
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1873 152.7 +1.30 +0.72 1.063 51.0% +63 — — 55.0% +0.40 5–3 (63%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.94
Career — 2016 155.1 +1.10 +0.30 1.024 50.4% +13 -149 -108 54.1% +0.15 85–94 (47%) 156–129 (55%) 101.7 +1.35 — 2233 169.6 +4.17 +2.64 1.181 52.7% +14 -50 +11 62.3% +0.85 135–115 (54%) 200–177 (53%) 97.9 +0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.