H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Frances Tiafoe vs Tomas Berdych H2H: 1-0
Frances Tiafoe holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Berdych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frances Tiafoe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frances Tiafoe won the 2018 Miami Masters third round 6-7(2) 6-2 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2018* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Frances Tiafoe | 6-7(2) 6-2 7-6(1) | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frances Tiafoe | #17 | #10 | 3,130 | 2,015 | 254 | 211 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frances Tiafoe | Tomas Berdych | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #108 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2017 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #79 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #39 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2019 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #59 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2021 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,927 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2022 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,979 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2023 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #16 | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2024 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #18 | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2025 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #30 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2026 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,941 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 |