H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Francisco Cerundolo vs Damir Dzumhur H2H: 3-0
Francisco Cerundolo holds a 3–0 lead over Damir Dzumhur in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Francisco Cerundolo leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Cerundolo won the 2026 Australian Open second round 6-3 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 27
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2026 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Francisco Cerundolo | 6-3 6-2 6-1 | Damir Dzumhur | Match data |
| Oct 29, 2025* | Rolex Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Francisco Cerundolo | 6-3 6-3 | Damir Dzumhur | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2025* | Nordea Open | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Francisco Cerundolo | 6-0 3-6 6-3 | Damir Dzumhur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Cerundolo | #22 | #18 | 2,475 | 1,966 | 154 | 117 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Damir Dzumhur | #108 | #23 | 1,665 | 1,951 | 136 | 171 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Cerundolo | Damir Dzumhur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2021 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #30 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #77 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #30 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2025 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #21 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2026 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #93 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #158 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #83 | 1,453 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |