H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Francisco Cerundolo vs Miomir Kecmanovic H2H: 3-0
Francisco Cerundolo holds a 3–0 lead over Miomir Kecmanovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Francisco Cerundolo leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Cerundolo won the 2025 Rolex Paris Masters third round 7-5 1-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 27
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Serbia
Age 26
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2025* | Rolex Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Francisco Cerundolo | 7-5 1-6 7-6 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2022* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | QF | Clay | Francisco Cerundolo | 5-7 6-2 6-4 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2022* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Francisco Cerundolo | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Cerundolo | #22 | #18 | 2,475 | 1,966 | 154 | 117 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Miomir Kecmanovic | #59 | #27 | 1,458 | 1,943 | 174 | 186 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Cerundolo | Miomir Kecmanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #44 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #69 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2021 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2022 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #30 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2023 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #54 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2024 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #51 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2025 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #21 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2026 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |