H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Emilio Benfele Alvarez H2H: 3-3

Francisco Clavet and Emilio Benfele Alvarez are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on clay. Most recently, Emilio Benfele Alvarez won the 2000 Kitzbuhel semifinal 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Emilio Benfele Alvarez
ESP Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 29, 2000* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 SF Clay Emilio Benfele Alvarez #150 6-3 7-5 Francisco Clavet #51 Match data
Nov 1, 1997* Bogota ATP 250 QF Clay Francisco Clavet #35 7-6(12) 2-3 (ret.) Emilio Benfele Alvarez #95 Match data
Aug 1, 1997* Amsterdam ATP 250 R16 Clay Francisco Clavet #42 6-1 2-6 6-4 Emilio Benfele Alvarez #101 Match data
May 14, 1997* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Emilio Benfele Alvarez #85 4-6 6-3 6-3 Francisco Clavet #29 Match data
Jul 25, 1996* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R32 Clay Emilio Benfele Alvarez #160 6-3 6-3 Francisco Clavet #30 Match data
Aug 4, 1994* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #91 6-7(7) 6-2 6-4 Emilio Benfele Alvarez #211 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Emilio Benfele Alvarez #1,529 #81 591 1,670 45 67 40.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Emilio Benfele Alvarez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1993 1–4 20.0% #198 1,482 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1994 4–4 50.0% #150 1,517 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1995 3–6 33.3% #176 1,527 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1996 8–8 50.0% #119 1,595 0 0
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1997 15–19 44.1% #103 1,587 0 0
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1998 7–12 36.8% #190 1,596 0 0
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1999 0–1 0.0% #141 1,575 0 0
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2000 6–7 46.2% #125 1,571 0 0
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2001 1–6 14.3% #273 1,495 0 0
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —