H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Fernando Meligeni H2H: 6-2

Francisco Clavet holds a 6–2 lead over Fernando Meligeni in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 5–2 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 2001 Acapulco third round 6-3 4-6 6-3.

ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
BRA Age 55 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 1, 2001* Acapulco ATP 250 R32 Clay Fernando Meligeni #100 6-3 4-6 6-3 Francisco Clavet #40 Match data
Mar 9, 2000* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard Francisco Clavet #43 6-0 6-3 Fernando Meligeni #28 Match data
Apr 17, 1999* Barcelona ATP 250 QF Clay Francisco Clavet #22 1-6 7-5 7-6(6) Fernando Meligeni #61 Match data
Aug 1, 1998* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 QF Clay Francisco Clavet #29 6-3 6-1 Fernando Meligeni #45 Match data
Sep 27, 1996* Palermo ATP 250 R16 Clay Francisco Clavet #27 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 Fernando Meligeni #122 Match data
Jul 27, 1995* Amsterdam ATP 250 R32 Clay Fernando Meligeni #55 3-6 6-4 6-3 Francisco Clavet #33 Match data
Oct 29, 1994* Santiago ATP 250 QF Clay Francisco Clavet #65 6-4 6-4 Fernando Meligeni #92 Match data
Apr 6, 1994* Barcelona ATP 250 R64 Clay Francisco Clavet #97 6-4 6-1 Fernando Meligeni #95 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Fernando Meligeni #675 #25 1,316 1,888 185 199 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Fernando Meligeni
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1991 2–2 50.0% #206 1,514 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1992 3–4 42.9% #169 1,497 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1993 6–7 46.2% #99 1,554 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1994 14–19 42.4% #91 1,599 0 0
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1995 22–18 55.0% #64 1,696 0 1
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1996 13–16 44.8% #94 1,651 0 2
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1997 24–19 55.8% #67 1,710 0 2
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 1998 18–20 47.4% #57 1,655 0 3
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 1999 27–26 50.9% #29 1,685 0 3
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2000 14–21 40.0% #100 1,622 0 3
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2001 17–16 51.5% #71 1,709 0 3
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,651 0 3
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2003 6–8 42.9% #210 1,638 0 3
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8