H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Francisco Gonzalez vs Buster C Mottram H2H: 1-0
Francisco Gonzalez holds a 1–0 lead over Buster C Mottram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francisco Gonzalez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Gonzalez won the 1980 Hong Kong third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 1980* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Francisco Gonzalez | 6-3 6-2 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Gonzalez | #997 | #40 | 0 | 1,758 | 105 | 157 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Buster C Mottram | #735 | #15 | 0 | 1,952 | 270 | 177 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Francisco Gonzalez | Buster C Mottram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #33 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #77 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #55 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #74 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #34 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 1981 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #41 | 1,852 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #98 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 1983 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #99 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #82 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #140 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |