H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Francisco Gonzalez vs Pavel Slozil H2H: 1-2
Pavel Slozil holds a 2–1 lead over Francisco Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Francisco Gonzalez leads 1–0 on carpet, while Pavel Slozil leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pavel Slozil won the 1985 US Open first round 6-3 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Pavel Slozil | 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Francisco Gonzalez | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1985* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Francisco Gonzalez | 6-2 7-5 | Pavel Slozil | Match data |
| May 25, 1983* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Pavel Slozil | 6-2 6-4 6-2 | Francisco Gonzalez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Gonzalez | #997 | #40 | 0 | 1,758 | 105 | 157 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pavel Slozil | #550 | #12 | 0 | 1,790 | 142 | 160 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Gonzalez | Pavel Slozil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #218 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #310 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #77 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #78 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #74 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #98 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1983 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #99 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #81 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1984 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #82 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #40 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #140 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1986 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |