H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Francisco Gonzalez vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 0-1

Roscoe Tanner holds a 1–0 lead over Francisco Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roscoe Tanner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1979 Cincinnati Open round of 16 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Gonzalez
PAR Age 70 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roscoe Tanner #5 6-1 6-2 Francisco Gonzalez Match data Aug 25, 1979* R16 Cincinnati Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francisco Gonzalez #997 #40 0 1,758 105 157 40.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,162 592 294 66.8% 1 0 0 0 16 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Gonzalez Roscoe Tanner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1970 0–9 0.0% — 1,416 0 0
19 1975 0–2 0.0% #308 1,486 0 0 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,706 0 0
20 1976 0–3 0.0% #272 1,455 0 0 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,910 0 0
21 1977 4–6 40.0% #281 1,499 0 0 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,837 0 0
22 1978 8–10 44.4% #61 1,602 0 0 1974 65–27 70.7% #14 1,963 0 2
23 1979 21–26 44.7% #77 1,649 0 0 1975 65–23 73.9% #9 1,972 0 5
24 1980 12–20 37.5% #74 1,704 0 0 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,018 0 9
25 1981 12–15 44.4% #98 1,659 0 0 1977 52–30 63.4% #13 1,889 1 11
26 1982 14–19 42.4% #100 1,685 0 0 1978 57–22 72.2% #11 1,940 1 13
27 1983 11–16 40.7% #99 1,623 0 0 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,032 1 15
28 1984 14–17 45.2% #82 1,654 0 0 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,996 1 16
29 1985 9–17 34.6% #140 1,533 0 0 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,925 1 17
30 1986 0–6 0.0% #548 1,470 0 0 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,785 1 17
31 — — — — — — — 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,874 1 17
32 — — — — — — — 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,680 1 17
33 — — — — — — — 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,662 1 17

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francisco Gonzalez Roscoe Tanner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1971 10 5 15 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1977 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1973 12 8 20 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 15 9 24 62.5%
22 1978 0 3 3 0.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — 1974 30 11 41 73.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 17 3 20 85.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1979 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1975 27 7 34 79.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 13 6 19 68.4%
24 1980 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1976 22 10 32 68.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 16 9 25 64.0%
25 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 6 9 15 40.0%
26 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1978 19 8 27 70.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 9 34 73.5%
27 1983 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1979 21 5 26 80.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 10 35 71.4%
28 1984 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 16 7 23 69.6%
29 1985 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% 5 6 11 45.5% 1981 19 8 27 70.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 21 8 29 72.4%
30 1986 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1 8 9 11.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 44 62 106 41.5% 26 43 69 37.7% 16 24 40 40.0% 19 28 47 40.4% — 209 102 311 67.2% 99 59 158 62.7% 121 42 163 74.2% 163 91 254 64.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francisco Gonzalez Roscoe Tanner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1479 102.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.17
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1417 113.2 — — — — +103 +73 — 13.6% -1.45 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.50
19 1975 1487 102.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 0–2 — -0.09 1971 1706 127.5 — — — — -2 -129 -172 56.9% +0.31 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.17
20 1976 1455 101.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.88 0–2 0–1 — +0.16 1972 1910 135.7 — — — — -21 -296 -167 59.5% +0.43 11–3 (79%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.27
21 1977 1500 113.8 — — — — +54 +17 — 39.1% -1.61 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.31 1973 1838 144.5 — — — — +53 -90 -106 56.7% +0.51 11–10 (52%) 15–15 (50%) — -3.40
22 1978 1602 128.6 — — — — -59 +21 — 41.0% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) — -1.22 1974 1963 154.0 — — — — -10 -226 +137 65.9% +1.12 16–13 (55%) 15–17 (47%) — -2.27
23 1979 1650 132.9 — — — — +20 -50 -143 44.3% -0.28 7–6 (54%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.49 1975 1972 153.3 — — — — +62 -153 +164 67.7% +1.19 19–14 (58%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.74
24 1980 1704 136.2 — — — — +18 -124 -228 40.5% -0.65 4–4 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.51 1976 2018 159.4 — — — — +24 -49 +104 66.7% +1.29 18–11 (62%) 18–20 (47%) — -2.11
25 1981 1659 126.6 — — — — +2 -100 -75 48.6% -0.11 2–4 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.46 1977 1890 153.2 — — — — -1 +22 +206 62.7% +0.94 13–18 (42%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.49
26 1982 1686 129.7 — — — — -33 -103 -85 46.4% -0.12 3–7 (30%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.29 1978 1941 160.3 — — — — +36 -25 +162 67.2% +1.20 10–8 (56%) 23–10 (70%) — -1.59
27 1983 1624 126.5 — — — — +5 -83 — 37.7% -0.84 4–0 (100%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.17 1979 2032 164.1 — — — — +32 -91 +131 71.3% +1.27 13–8 (62%) 22–14 (61%) — -3.91
28 1984 1655 132.0 — — — — -20 -90 +1 46.9% -0.02 4–6 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.36 1980 1997 154.8 — — — — +23 — +198 70.9% +1.29 6–10 (38%) 17–5 (77%) — -1.79
29 1985 1533 120.3 — — — — +42 — +57 39.1% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — +1.77 1981 1926 156.1 — — — — +117 — +82 66.0% +1.02 14–9 (61%) 19–13 (59%) — -0.51
30 1986 1470 107.8 — — — — +29 — — 13.3% -2.07 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.28 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +4 — +208 51.5% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 10–12 (45%) — -2.07
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1874 146.4 — — — — -44 — +125 53.4% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) — -4.29
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1681 120.1 — — — — -28 — — 25.8% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.69
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1662 99.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.08
Career — 1759 134.8 — — — — +8 -53 -47 42.2% -0.47 34–40 (46%) 53–60 (47%) 102.8 +0.56 — 2162 157.4 — — — — +30 -96 +112 63.1% +0.88 155–123 (56%) 200–155 (56%) 99.8 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.